Indeed interesting! And certainly those who play fast and loose with the rules will eventually be caught, although by who is a variable. It is also clear that some organizations cultures are devoid of integrity, (I will not name names here). At some point the truth will be revealed. And at some point judgement day will arrive, perhaps sooner for some than for others.

Interesting, and potentially a game changer cure for the present virus pandemic. But far more attention getting is the collection of weasel words as described in the section "Forward Looking Statements", which I interpret as Hype with possible lies.

So what starts out as the announcement of a game changing creation becomes a highly qualified "We Think" document. Really rather disappointing.

Would I invest in this organization?? I am not sure if I would.

perhaps TRevor had seen a clue that others did not notice.

Once again it seems that oil futures ales will cause damage to all who are not part of the adventure. So once again I am asserting that the law should demand that all oil futures trading require 100% cash, no credit or other leverage allowed at all.

Certainly the question of "Why is it moving" is important if a stock IS moving. And it probably matters also if it is not moving. That is a great introduction.

The "interesting" thing about that infrastructure bill is the LIE!! less than half of that money was for actual infrastructure projects. The rest is for NON INFRASTRUCTURE things that may be beneficial or not. So the term starts out with a big lie. Why should I believe a government that starts out with a big lie?

So forget any optomistic consumer confidence, I have none, at least no confidence that the new regime being willing to tell the truth or deal honestly. If all of those other areas that got so much funding had merit, they could have survived with single subject appropriations.

And the words chosen for the section "Economic news" failed to clearly convey any information. What is "a beat"?? Please leave jargon and slang out when attempting to provide information.

VERY INTERESTING INDEED!!! And a fact that I had not really taken into account. I am aware of one male among those I know who has been gaming the system for years. Simply a parasite feeding of of those of us working for our livings.

Now should I judge others against my work ethic?? I am not the one who decided that the benefit provided by an employee should match the compensation given to that employee. That is rather basic to physics, that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Any other arrangement creates an unnatural imbalance that will eventually lead to a correction. This applies both in the micro-economy and, eventually, in the macro economy, although probably the correlation is not so obvious.

Certainly this is an interesting ad exhaustive analysis, although the question of does it prove we are into a recession or not is less clear. Certainly the situation is not like it should be, and undoubtedly that is due to meddling with the natural process, whatever that might be.

The unfortunate fact is that letting either fools or misguided folks steer the ship usually results in less than the best path being followed. And letting a group with a conflicting personal agenda steer is always a worst choice, with the present situation being an example.

How the general "helicopter" dispersion of funds is going to help those in need is not clear. The funds that I received did nothing to alter my economic situation, while they would have been a great benefit to somebody facing foreclosure or eviction. So applying a bit more evaluation and thinking as to who should get the money would have been a whole lot smarter, but totally against the liberal bleating about fairness.

And so now we see the detailed analysis about recessions and what seems obvious but not stated is that they are a recurring thing that happens. In engineering terms we attribute that to excessive feedback of the incorrect magnitude and phase, translating to "excessive correction at the wrong times.

So what is missing is a description of what the federal reserve folks were doing relative to what was happening. That might show where changes in the response should be. Those who do not learn from mistakes will probably make them again, if they survive.

Why are so many expecting inflation?? Could it be that in the past few hundreds of years every burst of printing money has lead to inflation? Could it be that many folks believe that the federal bank is at best totally misguided and at worst a bunch of LIARS??? I've been lied to before and I still don't like it.

That new omnibus spending bill once again shows us why all legislative bills should be limited in topic and the size of the wording. Putting his entire agenda in one spending bill that includes a bit of worthwhile stuff and then 329 pages of assorted giveaways is a rotten sneaky trick, often used by those who wish to cram through their ultra-liberal agendas that would never be approved if standing alone.

Truly our new governance has FUBARRED the works. (military definition of FUBARRED intended here.)

Thus those who can move to gold or other precious metals are making wise moves. The one other possible shelter is real-estate, but that is subject to assorted random variables and not nearly as liquid.

Are we doomed? Possibly, most good human creations are not permanent.

Reflation = Return of inflation?????