Why Goldman Unsurprisingly Avoided Archegos Losses

Goldman almost always sidesteps trouble. That’s one of the conclusions from the Archegos blow-up that is estimated to have cost the firm’s lenders as much as $10BN.

Imagine the discussion among Credit Suisse (CS), Nomura (NRSCF), Morgan Stanley (MS), Goldman Sachs (GS), UBS (UBS) and Wells Fargo (WFC) as they considered an orderly liquidation of the hemorrhaging Archegos portfolio. It was a mismatch of men and boys – according to reports, Goldman warned that the market would quickly realize the scale of the problem, depressing the prices of what they were trying to sell and leading to a very disorderly liquidation.

It seems so obvious. Some Wall Street firms are sharper than others. Goldman and Morgan Stanley, who had sensibly adopted the role of observers not participants, evidently relied on this subtle distinction to immediately sell the Archegos collateral they held once they understood the scale of the problem. Nomura and Credit Suisse, in a high stakes version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma, thought time was on their side. They just forgot that Goldman wasn’t.

Goldman Sachs is full of street smart, talented people. In the 1980s and 1990s when I was trading interest rate swaps at JPMorgan, if Goldman was your counterparty to a trade it was worth taking a second look. They rarely seemed to be forced participants – often they’d identified a mispricing or arbitrage opportunity. Whenever I found Goldman on the other side of my trades, I often traded less than my full position while I figured out what could be driving their decision to go the other way. Pausing rarely cost the opportunity – markets moved their way more often than not.

In 1998, when hedge fund Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) was blowing up, their biggest swap counterparties gathered to discuss an orderly liquidation. LTCM was our biggest counterparty, but then LTCM was everybody’s biggest counterparty. Their abundance of PhDs and egos had created a colossus that generated tens of millions of dollars a month in profits for the banks trading with them.

1 2 3
View single page >> |

Disclosure: We are invested in all the components of the American Energy Independence Index via the ETF that ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
William K. 2 weeks ago Member's comment

Indeed interesting! And certainly those who play fast and loose with the rules will eventually be caught, although by who is a variable. It is also clear that some organizations cultures are devoid of integrity, (I will not name names here). At some point the truth will be revealed. And at some point judgement day will arrive, perhaps sooner for some than for others.

Flat Broke 2 weeks ago Member's comment

The problem with Wall Street is the punishments for bad behavior tend to be a monetary slap on the wrist. One that is a fraction of the money made or saved from the bad behavior. Thing about how Wells Fargo got away with stealing money from it's own customers. Or how Google was fined a mere $13 million for stealing user data that they made billions of off.

If the risk outweighed the rewards, we'd see a far more well behaved Wall Street. Or if they were threatened with jail time, that might help too.

William K. 2 weeks ago Member's comment

F.B. Certainly you are correct, unfortunately taking away every cent of the profit would be regarded as "cruel and unusual punishment" and so the bad actors do get away with their evil ways. Of course, if I were elected King things would be different. That is not likely to happen here in the USA. Plus, I do not even want to be king.

Alexis Renault 2 weeks ago Member's comment

What exactly happened with Archegos?

Adam Reynolds 2 weeks ago Member's comment