I had given some thought for a Sunday sermon today, but recent events changed my mind. Yesterday, i received a comment from what i thought was one of my more important followers, but my follower was so off-base with his comment that it was like someone "bursting my bubble". How could someone misconstrue what i said in yesterday's post? Yet, it seems like i might be the only person who really believes what i say.
-----
Listen to me once again. One, nuclear war is not an option for any nation to consider. It's questionable whether anyone could come out of a nuclear war unscathed, yet one thing is for certain--China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia would be totally destroyed. So, let's take "nuclear war" out of the equation
Now that leaves us with minor wars instead. Wars like Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Hamas, which my good old follower pointed out are nothing like a "world war". So, who gives a fuck whether it is "minor wars" or "world wars", one thing remains true. If you have the United States on your side you will "win" the war. And that is a guarantee as long as the United States decides to back that nation. And there is not another military threat out there that can do anything about it.
Now, if that doesn't sound similar to the position that the United States was in in 1945 after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, well shame on me for using it as a analogy.
-----
What about China and Taiwan, Jim?
Come on dudes, how many times must i tell you about the United States secret plans to "sink the Chinese Navy" in case of a military attempt to cease Taiwan. Let's just say this is about the tenth time i have mentioned it in a post on Talkmarkets.
-----
So there. It's not overly complex to see. And that is half the fucking problem. World Peace is an easy thing to conceive, and it would even be an easy thing to implement. Yet people try to make world peace sound too complex to achieve, or too much of a pipedream to pursue.
And that fault is with them and not me.
------
ps. I am open for other comments.
