As we wait for U.S. election results things still remain somewhat quiet.  I must admit that i heard some "reporter" say that word has it that the U.S. is putting pressure on Zelensky to cut a deal with Putin. 

That makes little sense to me.  What kind of deal can you make where Ukraine does not end up with Crimea?  I thought that was part of a previous deal back in the early 1990s.  And a deal is a deal.  Judgment will always go against the party that tries to break a legitimate deal.  So, the question remains--what kind of pressure is the U.S. putting on Zelensky.   Because the ball is in the hands of Putin--not Zelensky.

Zelensky could be kind and let the Russians that are living in Crimea stay and continue to live there--as long of course, they understand that they will actually be living under the laws and rules of Ukraine--and not those of Russia.  All taxes would go to Ukraine, etc.    

No one gets hurt out of the deal and things start getting back to the way they were before Putin grabbed Crimea back in 2013 with no reaction other than essentially rebuking Russia and throwing them out of the G8.

Sometimes it is good, just to get the end back to the starting point, especially when war is involved.

Anyway, I don't put much weight to the "reporter's" story.  It could be true, but i just don't see how Russia can end up with any part of what we knew was Ukraine after the 1990 deak.  One must remember.  Ukraine gave something up in that deal for what they got in return.  Ukraine did their part of the bargain, so the other party has no right to "break" the deal.  Sorry, Vladimir.  You would lose in the court of the "free world's judgment".  That's simply the way it must be.

-------

Which brings me to somewhat of a sore point that i have been thinking about.  Why has "globanomics" been sheltered and protected from "outside" review?  What is so god-blessed controversial about "globanomics" that keeps it from being shared with the general population of the world.  It's just someone's "optimistic" theory for world government.  What's wrong with having a discussion on something like that?

What's wrong with having some discussion about the greatness of the United States while remaining humble in the process?

I just simply don't understand.  So here is what i did this morning.  I went back to my "blog history" and i tracked the history of "globanomics" in Talkmarkets.  And here is how just some of that history played out.

My first actual "blog" was made on October 19, 2020 (just a little over two-years ago).  In that first blog, i led anyone who was interested to four things:

1. Globanomics Reintroduced

2. Lesson One in Globanomics

3. Lesson Two in Globanomics

4. The Economics of Love

Within the next month (by Nov 14, 2020) i had explained the National Hierarchy of Needs, the Electronic Global Stock Market Board, and voting power using the EGSB.

On January 25, 2021 i showed the results of my Breakthrough Analysis, reinforcing China's paper tiger thing in terms of globanomics.

On March 1  i wrote a good piece on the global perspective of p/e ratios

By the end of May (May 29, 2021) i was talking about two houses of government, agencies, etc.

Essentially, what i am showing here is by the end of May 2021, i knew i had all the material that i needed to write the book that i had been planning to write called Globanomics.  I knew this at the time and i even told people this was the case.  I continued to blog but i pretty much told everyone that i was going to take the summer off and wait until Linda and i returned from our annual two-week vacation to Destin, Florida at the end of September.  

So, in other words, i was rested and ready to go.  All i needed to do was start "cutting and pasting" my various blogs together and turn them into a "complete book".  I started working on that task around October 7 and completed the task less than one-month later November 4, 2021.

I announced the publication of Globanomics to my followers on November 7, 2021.  And if the truth were told, i rushed publishment so it could be out there helping the 2022 midterm elections.  Previously, i had promised myself and others, too, that i would publish it by April 1, 2022.  I beat that date by almost five-months because i did not like the way people were talking at the time--in other words, i was really scared about our democracy when i wrote Globanomics.

And coincidentally, as i just glanced down to see what todays date is, i noticed it is November 7, 2022.

Exactly one year later--and no one has heard about globanomics.

It makes you wonder what one's followers do with the information that you give them.  They sure as to hell, don't share any of it.  And that brings one back again to the initial question.  What's so f------ scary about globanomics?

Exactly one year later!