I want to start out with the first part of my perspective, which has to do with manners of "censureship". I have the numbers to prove already what is going on with my blog. I have many ways to prove that there must be at least some form of "censureship" that is going on. And if you don't know what i am talking about just go back into the records and look at the four or five of my deletions. Yes, i deleted them, but i did that more for you than i did it for myself. I thought about leaving those "low viewed" blogs in my collection. I know the slight risk differences in my writing and i can understand holding some things back.
I can see keeping certain things more "secret" than others. I can understand out of the possible group of those who get to see my work that certain ones might be pushing things "too far" or "too fast". I will admit to be the first person to admit that i can be "nasty" regarding the speed and sometimes too far out there yet politically. I cannot understand holding some of that stuff back. But that is where i leave the first perspective and begin looking at from a second perspective--what i would call the Globanomic Perspective.
From the Globanomic perspective--nothing else makes any sense. Globanomics should already be out there. People all over the world should be reading Globanomics. They will all understand what i am saying in Globanomics. Even Russia and China can learn the benefits to them at the same time. We can walk and chew gum at the same time, we can also walk, chew gum, blow bubbles, snap our fingers, turn our nexts, stare ahead or aside all at the same time. Bring Peace to the World and the United States too is out there within our grasp, and that is what Globanomics is telling you.
I say in Globanomics that it is going to come sooner or later, either that or we have destroyed the usefulness of the human species. And maybe, just maybe i have just thought a place to start exploring a Third Perspective, starting from this last perspective which i have just told you about.
ps. One time earlier, i raised my "censureship" concerns regarding a payment manner. Some of you might remember all the "hulla balloo" that brought up. I had a record number of views and respondees to that one. I remember that. I remember losing my Talkmarket rights to get articles published--got me on what was probably wrong, but not really in any meaningful way. I do not mind being censored--that is not the point.
I just want to know the one, two, three, or whatever order of censureship that is going on. I hate to work for people that i do not know. And that includes the kind of people i thought i was writing to.
Now that Linda has passed, i want to know that more than ever. You can send me names in mail using USPS if you want. I do not care how cautiously and kindly that that can be done, but i want to know the names, so we can agree on the rules for further participation.
I think you might be getting a sense of what it means to be in my mindset right now. You may silence me more if you want. But personally, i think it is time to get together.
I would like to end with a couple of additional things further. I like Boaz a lot. Boaz has always been at his professional best when dealing with all of my "controversies". I like Talkmarkets a lot!. And with that, i think enough is said.
I don't really understand this post at all. Who do you think is "censoring" you? Google? The internet as a whole?
This site has a very limited audience and isn't as big as sites like Yahoo Finance or Seeking Alpha, or Investing.com. Plus your blog posts can be hard to find since they really only appear in the homepage activity feed briefly. And since this is a stock site, and your posts never have anything to do about stocks, it won't appeal to the majority of readers here.
I'm only even hear because I was curious about the title when I saw it on the Activity Feed, and thought it was going to be something completely diferent.
Your comment seemed to some earlier one's that i have received in similar manners. Been there and done that and that is all i have to say in this reply.
I don't really understand your reply, but do you have any proof that you have been censored by anyone?