Killing time this morning, i asked ChatGPT the following question: "What is Jim Boswell's relationship with globanomics?"
Now here is what Chat told me.
-------
As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, I do not have any information about an individual named Jim Boswell or his relationship with "globanomics." It's possible that these are developments that have occurred after my last update or are not widely known within the scope of my training data.
If Jim Boswell is a person who has become relevant in the field of globanomics after September 2021, or if "globanomics" refers to a concept or term that has emerged recently, I would not have information about it. I recommend searching for recent sources or news articles to get the most up-to-date information on this topic.
--------
Personally, i wouldn't bother searching for the most up-to-date information because i think the result would be the same.
Neither Jim Boswell nor globanomics exist as far as anyone outside of my followers know.
And that is a "full disclosure" of the world i live in.
ChatGPT makes mistakes and doesn't know everything. And it knows nothing from the last 2 or 3 years. I wouldn't get down about what ChatGPT says about you.
I wouldn't other than the fact that i was writing about Globanomics as long ago as 2010. I can find a link between me and globanomics better than ChatGPT by just googling my name and globanomics. Go figure.
That just goes to show that despite all of ChatGPTs advantages, it is sill very lacking in some areas.
Have to agree with you.