Snap Out Of It: GoPro Or Go Home

Most software is fungible these days. Snap (NYSE: SNAP) has called itself a "camera company," which is clumsy shorthand for its goal of becoming a premier consumer hardware company. While Snap has successfully created exciting marketing events with its filters and is well-situated to promote blockbuster movies, this expertise alone cannot justify its current valuation. Following Larry Ellison's unrelated comments many years ago about "going back to the future," hardware is becoming sexy again because software features are easily replicated.

My main concerns are 1) Snap's main user base is between 10 and 29 years old; and 2) GoPro (Nasdaq: GPRO)) is already the premier camera company.

With respect to 1), this group lacks high levels of disposable income and isn't known for brand loyalty, indicating hardware margins or profit may be stressed. As for 2), if Snap plans on avoiding competition with GoPro by focusing on teenagers and younger adults with cheaper products, Polaroid and vintage cameras have already been done. Spectacles is not revolutionary unless you count flashing lights as a remarkable innovation over Google Glass. How does Snap plan on differentiating itself long-term?

Unlike Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN), Snap cannot displace existing software and hardware companies, which have entrenched users and their own "sticky" ecosystems. Furthermore, how many different ecosystems will consumers tolerate before they become frustrated? A quick online search shows several apps capable of adding both filters and special effects to pictures, such as In short, Snap lacks a "wide moat" from a technological standpoint and needs to quickly capitalize on its accomplishment of being first to market and capturing younger users.

Being first to market can be a long-lasting advantage in the consumer market. Success begets success as retailers provide more prominent shelf space to faster-selling products, leading to relationships between suppliers, advertisers, and manufacturers that are hard to displace. If a consumer company is first to market, competitors often end up vying for second place, fighting over shelf and virtual space that hasn't already been allocated to the market leader. Older readers might remember that Gameboy was first to market and maintained its leadership position in the videogame industry, even though Sega later produced a much better product. In fact, Nintendo continues to ride the success of the Gameboy today, while Sega sputtered with its Dreamcast console, becoming the Reebok to Nintendo's Nike.

1 2 3 4
View single page >> |

Disclosure: as of March 7, 2017, I own individual shares in GoPro (GPRO).  I do not own any individual shares in Snap (SNAP) and have no plans of buying SNAP in 2017.  I own ETFs and mutual ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Chee Hin Teh 3 years ago Member's comment

Thanks for sharing

Doug Morris 3 years ago Member's comment

Catchy headline. I think you are right that history will repeat itself here. But what's to stop a company like #Google or #Amazon getting into this space? Maybe even #Facebook?


Danny Straus 3 years ago Member's comment

Excellent points in this article. And I like your #Nintendo vs. #Sega analogy but you compared Apples to Oranges. Gameboy was a portable handheld. Dreamcast was a console system. A better comparison would be how Sega's 16GB Genesis was better than Ninendo's 8bit NES system or how their full color GameGear portable was better than Ninendo's black and white dinky Gameboy. But like VHS and Beta, Nintendo won out.

Bruce Powers 3 years ago Member's comment

Very true. I remember all my friends had #Nintendo Game Boys but I thought it was lame. I had a #Sega Game Gear which was a thousand times better. Still have it somewhere too. But Game Boys stuck around and had new and better iterations. Game Gears disappeared shortly there after. And of course we know Sega got out of the hardware business all together.

Alexis Renault 3 years ago Member's comment

Glad I received this article in my instant stock alerts email. You've completely changed my view on $SNAP. I was getting caught up in the hype of #Snap's #Spectacles, but I think you are right on the money - it's just a fad. I like your suggestion of partnering with existing hardware companies like #Fitbit and #GoPro. That makes far more sense for all the reasons you outlined. $SNAP $FIT $GPRO