Alan Brochstein - Comments
Independent Analyst
I have worked in the investment industry since 1986 and earned the CFA charter in 1997. I worked for Kidder, Peabody in bonds from 1986-1992 and then First Boston's investment management subsidiary from 1992-1994, both in NYC. I then joined Criterion Investment Management (later acquired by ...more
Latest Comments
Why Investors Should Pay For PEY
11 days ago
I think that it is very important to pay attention to the costs of the ETFs, but "reasonable" can work over "ultra-low." Every reader will have a different time-frame, so there is no single answer, but I can say that over 5 years, this ETF will cost investors about 2% total, which could be reduced to close to zero with very different ETFs. I think that the relative return will be better than this over five years. Clearly, the past five years, this index did not keep up with the S&P 500.
In this article: PEY, SCHD, RSP, VYM, SMDV
Why Investors Should Pay For PEY
11 days ago
That is a good question! As a complement is my answer
In this article: PEY, SCHD, RSP, VYM, SMDV
Why Investors Should Pay For PEY
11 days ago
I am not really sure. What I can say is that Tech has grown a lot, but that growth is very concentrated in terms of revenue. And, the debt has grown too! If you want Technology exposure, that is your choice, but there are good ways to get it, like RSPT, another Invesco ETF. It operates under an equal-weighting scheme at rebalancings.
In this article: PEY, SCHD, RSP, VYM, SMDV
Consider These ETFs To Diversify
15 days ago
II agree with that daily issue, but I don't agree at all about your main point. NOT AT ALL!
In this article: RSP, SPY, SMDV, QQQ, AAPL, MSFT, NVDA
Consider These ETFs To Diversify
15 days ago
I may be missing out! I was hoping you had some that I was following or that I should follow. You may not be looking to learn anything, but I hope that you know about how trees don't grow to the moon. In other words, no one should care about how something has performed as much as about how it will perform in the future. With that said, we are human and can't predict the future with certainty.
In this article: RSP, SPY, SMDV, QQQ, AAPL, MSFT, NVDA
Consider These ETFs To Diversify
15 days ago
I don't cover any of those, as they have a Canada bias. Nothing against Canada, but I focus on only USD ETFs that are passive.
In this article: RSP, SPY, SMDV, QQQ, AAPL, MSFT, NVDA
Consider These ETFs To Diversify
16 days ago
Which is one that you like better?
In this article: RSP, SPY, SMDV, QQQ, AAPL, MSFT, NVDA
Consider These ETFs To Diversify
16 days ago
Sorry, I am not sure I understand what you are asking.
In this article: RSP, SPY, SMDV, QQQ, AAPL, MSFT, NVDA
Consider These ETFs To Diversify
16 days ago
Well, if the largest stocks don't keep outpacing, SPY could underperform RSP. The real risk, though, is in a falling market. Remember last April? It didn't really happen then. RSP and SPY fell equally from 3/31 to 4/8. From the end of 2021 until March 4, 2022, SPY fell 12.2%, while RSP fell 8.5%.
In this article: RSP, SPY, SMDV, QQQ, AAPL, MSFT, NVDA
OGI: My Favorite Canadian LP
17 days ago
Again, I wrote an article. Do you have access to Seeking Alpha? Here is that link: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4846964-sell-village-farms-and-buy-organigram
In this article: OGI
1 to 10 of 19 comments