QCEW Release And 4 Measures Of NFP Employment

Here’s a picture of employment, normalized to 2022M03.

Figure 1: Nonfarm payroll employment from CES (bold black), from CPS adjusted to NFP concept (light green), from Philadelphia Fed early benchmark (brown), all s.a., and from QCEW, n.s.a. (blue), all in logs 2023M03=0. Source: BLS via FRED, BLS, BLS/QCEWPhiladelphia Fed, and author’s caclulations.

While QCEW indicates a slightly lower cumulative growth than the official NFP series, it is only slightly less through March (2.4% vs. 2.6% official, and 2.3% from Philadelphia Fed). Since the graph is in logs, the flattening of the curves indicates deceleration.

Another way of seeing the trajectory of employment is to look at year-on-year growth rates (calculated in log differences), which addresses the seasonality issue.

Figure 2: Year-on-year growth rate of nonfarm payroll employment from CES (bold black), from CPS adjusted to NFP concept (light green)., and from QCEW (blue). Source: BLS via FRED, BLS, BLS/QCEWPhiladelphia Fed, and author’s caclulations.

BLS notes that the implied benchmark revision to NFP is down by 306K.


More By This Author:

The Return Of The Economic Undead
US GDP Deflator, Broad Money, And Velocity
Russia’s Current Account Surplus Disappears
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with