Any updates on this?

This is very eye opening. I've always thought of lockdowns as saving lives. I hadn't realized they could cost more to die from things like hunger, than the disease itself might have killed.

Excellent analysis. You've taken a very complex concept and made it understandable.

What would it take for Facebook to take a real hit? I would think they've lost millions if not billions in advertising already.

Vaccinations causing death is a straight out lie that is further spread by anti-vaxers. I'd like you to try to send factual proof of a death being directly attributed to a vaccine. Not so easy is it? That's because there has only been ONE such death:

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599698/

"there was one death due to a vaccine strain viral infection: a 3-month-old infant died from myocarditis after oral polio vaccine (which is no longer licensed for use in the United States) and DTP vaccine."

True, there is a difference between this case and other patent infringement cases. That being said the case against Huaweii is fuzzy at best.

If they don't find a cure, yes it will. Even with a low death rate, if enough people get infected, the death toll will be very high.

I understand the benefits of what FDR did - that served a dual purpose of helping the US infrastructure while giving people jobs. But I never understood the concept of things like paying farmers not to farm. What good does that do?

@[Gary Anderson](user:4798), you have more patience than I. There will always be #Trump apologists who refuse to admit he can do no wrong. Even when Trump is on record as making an inappropriate comment, these people excuse it away or deny the statement was ever made. Save your breadth.

Thanks so much for the response, Tom!