Fascinating, but if I understand correctly, your entire argument hinges on the assumption that self-driving cars will make many people irrelevant. But why?
It just means that people will be in the backseat or passenger seat instead of the driver's seat. The only people who may not be around are taxi drivers, and even some of them may prefer to stick around for the ride. And if not, they won't be the first profession to disappear and be replaced with something else.
Latest Comments
Why Facebook Is Looking Less And Less Appealing
An opinion piece. The author is under the assumption $FB Maxed out. They have been doing the same thing to $AAPL, waiting for it to fall.
4 Power-Packed Energy Stocks To Buy On Oil Surge
Do you actually think VLO stock price will go up?
WTI Crude Tumbles To $44 Handle (As Algos Forget US Closed)
You think oil opens down tomorrow? Been so volatile lately what's your short term view?
Technically Speaking: A Sucker's Rally?
Definitely, and a good one at that!
Goodyear Tire: Outstanding Turnaround, Decent Buy
Excellent analysis, thank you. I've added you to my follow list.
Basics: Bonds Versus Stocks
Finance 101 at it's finest, thanks.
The Next Energy Sector Collapse — Coming SOON…
I disagree but to each their own.
How To Effectively Replace Mutual Funds With ETFs In Your Portfolio
Makes sense, thanks. And good luck with those lotto tickets!
Conspiracy! Self Driving Cars And Culling The Human Population
Fascinating, but if I understand correctly, your entire argument hinges on the assumption that self-driving cars will make many people irrelevant. But why?
It just means that people will be in the backseat or passenger seat instead of the driver's seat. The only people who may not be around are taxi drivers, and even some of them may prefer to stick around for the ride. And if not, they won't be the first profession to disappear and be replaced with something else.
Or am I missing the crux of your article?
Apple Preparing For Huge IPhone 6S Launch
My sentiments exactly.