That would be great! Thanks. Please send it to me. Is it something that could be posted? Or found somewhere else for others?

Hi Trevor, Do you have any thoughts on whether Tcelna will be successful in studies and get approval. What phase of testing is it in? Thanks, Ilene

Thank you Michael!

Moon, are there any other companies that are more reasonably valued that you like for betting on the future of electric cars? Thanks.

Thank you. I'm sure Pam would appreciate your comment. I really enjoy her articles too.

So it's not so much about whether coffee prices are going up but whether the company will profit, and that you research--find companies that have it figured out and strategized the best. How do you find out how the companies are hedging - how much? And then you have to predict the weather trends too?

Thanks Chris. Are some coffee retailers going to be hurt by the price increases?

Hi Chris, are you not assuming that coffee retailers will increase their prices higher than the prices increases for them, and that they trade with a positive correlation to the price of coffee. Do you have support for this assumption? Or am I missing something?

"If I were an investor in his service I would have a HUGE problem..." Me: That's true for any influential analyst. Are you suggesting laws dictating what analyst's decisions may and may not be based on? Maybe the analyst could base his opinion on morals and then lie about it to the pass "analyst opinion appropriateness inspection." Seems completely unworkable. Good luck with it.

I think it's pretty simple. He must have stated his method because that's what we're talking about. There's no obligation to be consistent, no obligation not to do a "first," and no obligation not to be one of a few analysts with a negative rating on AAPL - all irrelevant. Don't see why this is confusing. Doesn't seem irrational, nor a disservice. No one is forcing anyone to read or pay for his opinion. I really don't see any problem here.