Is Bitcoin Under-Owned?

Bitcoin Under-Owned?

As we discussed in the last article, institutional investors said Bitcoin was the most overvalued security in the world. Since my last post, the price of Bitcoin has fallen below $4,000. Some of the speculation has left the market. The chart below gives you an additional way to look at Bitcoin. It compares Bitcoin’s market cap to the total U.S. mutual funds and ETF assets under management. This is an end-around to get to the asset allocation. Since the only ETF which lets you buy Bitcoin is the Bitcoin Investment Trust which sells Bitcoin at a premium, I doubt that number is accurate. Bitcoin is taking in money from speculators. Those who do venture deals and invest in startups are the people investing in Bitcoin. Cryptocurrencies take in money from young investors just like how the 1990s tech stocks had young investors.

While this chart isn’t perfectly accurate, it does make the argument that many hedge fund managers wouldn’t take the plunge into Bitcoin because it’s too volatile look foolish. Obviously, many people with capital have invested in Bitcoin. That’s how it got to $5,000. Looking at Bitcoin as a percentage of the assets under management is like how gold investors determine if the yellow metal is under owned or over owned. Bitcoin has an advantage over gold in that it’s being used to transact. It has a function which encourages more people to buy it. The hope is that with the expanding price garnering attention, more people will learn about it and use it to buy goods and services online.

(Click on image to enlarge)

New iPhone X Is Released

The new iPhone devices were unveiled on Tuesday, dominating the headlines. As expected, Apple released 3 new models, the iPhone 8/8 Plus and the iPhone X. Some investors were disappointed with the delayed launch of the iPhone X, which can be pre-ordered on October 27th and bought on November 3rd, but that isn’t an issue in my opinion. It’s still going to be available for the Christmas sales rush. As we discussed before the release of the devices, the key push for Apple is going to be differentiating the iPhone X from the iPhone 8/8 Plus to upsell as many people as possible. Apple did this by bringing the infinity display only to the iPhone X. The iPhone X also has face recognition instead of a finger print scanner. This is going to get Apple fans to pay the $999 that the iPhone X costs instead of the $699/$799 that the iPhone 8/8 Plus cost. The risk Apple is taking is that the middle range Android phones, now have superior screens to the iPhone 8/8 Plus. The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an infinity display and costs $100 less. That might be a problem for Apple. It will hurt market share, but help profitability. Samsung’s Galaxy S8 is a great device, but it’s too good in the sense that it prevents people from buying the Note 8.

1 2 3
View single page >> |

Disclaimer: Neither TheoTrade or any of its officers, directors, employees, other personnel, representatives, agents or independent contractors is, in such capacities, a licensed financial adviser, ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience. Users' ratings are only visible to themselves.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
David B. Johnson 3 years ago Member's comment

A currency has value as long as believe perceive it to have value.

Moon Kil Woong 3 years ago Contributor's comment

Bitcoin is only dropping because of the multiplication effect of other crypto currencies. What people will find out is that the multiplication of crypto currencies deflates the value of each one as the assets going to the field get divided. Thus the crypto limitation of currency is meaningless. If 100 crypto currencies appear value will drop for each no matter how few shares the currency allows miners to create. Crypto currencies are their own biggest enemies and the limitation of one dominating due to the slow creation of currencies actually prevents one from rapidly garnering enough market share to shut the rest of them down by becoming the preeminent currency.

As big players enter even Bitcoin may feel the pressure.

Gregory Burns 3 years ago Member's comment

I don't follow that logic. Isn't each crypto currency completely independent? That's like saying if another country was created and issued their own currency, the currencies of all other countries would fall. #bitcoin $bitcomp

Moon Kil Woong 3 years ago Contributor's comment

Actually currencies do tend to trade in concert with each other and is why stimulus in once currency tends to help the global economy as money migrates to other currencies. Cryptos are much smaller and not directly linked to economies so they trade more like a commodity like gold. Only so much is flowing to cryptos and the more there are the more the cash stream gets fragmented hurting each currency as well as the movement. If you thought the beta max wars were bad, just wait until the crypto currency wars start. There will be mass confusion and then some will die losing money for those in them causing more anger.

It remains a dangerous gambit. Unregulated currency production tends to lead to this.

Terrence Howard 3 years ago Member's comment

Thanks for explaining.