You are correct. This site gave you way too many chances. This will be the last time I rspond to one of your posts and I will ask this site to remove you for repeated violations of the site's terms of use, and commond decency. May God forgive your soul, but I suspect you are going to hell for all of your hate.
I have refrained from commenting on your posts since you went off the deep end with your hate filled rants. But I now realize you are completely INSANE. Why are you blaming innocent people for a war and your wife's death? Do you realize how absurd you sound? Your wife would be ASHAMED of you and your hate! You need to be institutionalized immediately for your own safety and the safety of authors.
This will probably do well for the stock, but I personally find it troubling that people want to have fake AI relationships rather than real relationships with actual people. Is this our future?
Can you elaborate on how the differences in options strategy (systematic calls vs discretionary overlays) impact upside capture and downside protection among these funds?
What specific risks does a simple, but poorly diversified portfolio expose an investor to, and how might those risks differ from a more traditional diversified portfolio?
You describe how ending Federal Reserve QT marks a return to ‘steady state’ liquidity — but given that the Fed’s balance sheet remains far above pre-pandemic levels, what risks do you see in having a permanently bloated central-bank balance sheet? Does ending QT really eliminate the distortions caused by earlier asset-purchases, or simply freeze them in place?
Are there structural/regulatory or macroeconomic risks (e.g. changes to approval rules, funding environment, interest rates) that might threaten the gains? For example, how do you account for the inherent volatility in biotech — where one failed trial can wipe out value — when projecting future highs after the deals?
Even if Tesla (or broader markets) are overvalued, bubble-style corrections don’t happen on schedule. What’s your view on the timeframe for a possible “crash”?
Really interesting read — I like how Venture Global is showing that energy projects can be both profitable and cleaner. It’s encouraging to see companies balancing growth with sustainability.
I really liked the distinction between ROI and ROL — the idea that success isn’t just about financial gain but also what your money does in the world. It made me think: how many advisory-firms are truly measuring that legacy component today?
Latest Comments
There Will Never Be A "Third" Chance
Of What Value Do You Feel Four Years Are Worth
Scienjoy Pivots To AI Digital Humans In $625B Market With Dubai Launch
ETF Battles: GPIQ Vs. QQA Vs. JEPQ Vs. QQQI- Income ETF Quadruple Header
Simple But Not Well Diversified
Fed Ends Quantitative Tightening (QT) - What Happened Last Time?
Biotech Deals Propel Sector To New 2025 Highs
Bulls Vs Bears Battle: Burry’s Legendary $500M+ Short – Crash Or Smash In 2025?
A Clean And Profitable Venture With Venture Global
ROI Vs. ROL: Why Wealth Advisors Should Be Talking About Return On Legacy