Really thought‑provoking piece. Given how much the cost of living, housing, and inflation have changed since the article was first written — do you think the number “$140,000” (or whatever benchmark was used) still makes sense today as a meaningful threshold for financial stress or “poverty”? What adjustments would you make now to that baseline, given changes in economy, cost structure and expectations over the past year?

Good article. Sounds like the company is undervalued to me. Worth taking a deeper dive.