Interesting take on the Greenland idea. Rather than focusing solely on a provocative headline, the underlying question seems to be about how the U.S. balances strategic interests with immigration policy. If the goal is stronger ties or access to Arctic resources, wouldn’t a broader conversation about cooperation, investment, and mutual benefit — including how borders and mobility factor in — be worth having? Curious what others think about how immigration and foreign policy intersect in this context

E.B. Capital MarketsGenerally I like your articles @mark mead

I always wait to see when something is up 30% in 2 weeks then pay the high.

That's exactly what I was thinking.

But Obama herself has given no inclination that she plans to run.  Plus itwould be a betrayal to their long term friend and party if she ran against Biden. I think it's unlikely.

Most definitely.

Where is the bullish pattern?

I don't consider 50,000 dead Americans over the next 4 weeks (according to CDC projections), to be "very low death rates."

This projection is qouting the CDC and taken from CNN's homepage right now. 

#Omicron is more dangerous than you imply. According to the CDC, Omicron is expected to kill nearly 50,000 Americans over the next 4 weeks alone. It will threaten critical infrustructure and will likely hit medical professionals particularly hard since it is so easy to catch.

Broken image link again.  You should ask for help in how to do this if you can't figure it out.