This doesn't sound very convincing to me at all. I agree the current tests are problematic since they give a lot of false test results and are expensive. More importantly, they are in short supply since they contain some hard to come by components. But a "more than 50%" chance of correctly telling you if you are infected is horrible. How much more than 50%? 51%? You'll have almost as good odds flipping a coin.

This is a refreshingly honest assessment of what it actually takes to invest and win in the market. There are no shortcuts, research is critical.

The pandemic is the best thing that's happened to gold in a long time.

True but it does sound promising. Like you, I'd be curious to see more info about the actual financials. But there is risk with every investment, and the greater the risk, the greater the potential payout.

Good article, nicely done. I will be checking out $PLX.

Thanks. You should get him to be a contributor here!

I've read there are issues with lack of peer review. A lot of doctors have their own agendas. This article is a real case in point, as it went viral but the doctors' clinical agenda was horribly flawed and skewed by financial incentives:

talkmarkets.com/.../are-covid-19-lockdowns-weakening-our-immune-systems

God help us we need a vaccine to get the world economy moving again. But I just read an article that says immunity for those that have recovered from COVID-19 is so short-lived, that it may really hamper the efforts of developing a vaccine.

Great article, looking to read more by you.

They aren't working because people in the US are ignoring calls to stay home. But if you look at other countries, the numbers are obvious. Lockdowns caused the numbers to drop. It's also common sense - people can't spread the disease if they are stuck at home.

But we also see from other countries, that as soon as the countries open up again, the cases do spike. So not sure what the answer is. We can't seem to win.