Gary Anderson Blog | Trump Administration's Strange Response To Ford Relocating To China | Talkmarkets
Muckraker of the Financial System

The Fed knew about the housing bubble before it burst but lied and said they didn't: Bill HR 1424 to buy bad paper (eventually called TARP) was introduced in March 9, 2007, before there began to be bad commercial paper from private subprime RE loans, in August.

I have ... more

Trump Administration's Strange Response To Ford Relocating To China

Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 5:25 PM EDT

Ford (F) is going to establish its new Focus plant to China. The plant was going to Mexico, a nation that has prospered recently, causing fewer Mexicans to seek economic survival in the United States. One would think that is a good thing and should be encouraged.

 

So it is perplexing to me that regarding the Ford Focus, Donald Trump's administration said this:

 

“The Ford decision shows how flexible multinational companies are in terms of geography,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in response to Ford’s news. “I believe that as President Trump’s policies and reforms take hold, more companies will begin to locate their facilities in the U.S. as several German and Japanese automakers already have.”

The perplexing thing about this is that Donald Trump has spent a lot of time threatening to punish Ford for making cars in Mexico, rather than in the United States. But wouldn't Mexico be better than China? But Trump was adamant about the possibility of tariffs for the new Mexico plant as we see from the Huffington Post article:
 

Trump called the Mexico move an “absolute disgrace” and threatened to levy tariffs on Mexican-made Ford vehicles. 

 

 

The Huffington Post subtitle was "President Trump Will Not Be Pleased to Hear This News". But I had suspicions when POTUS did not immediately come out blasting Ford for moving Focus production from Mexico to China. And Ross's comments certainly confirm my suspicions. 

 

To be realistic, components of cars come from many places, just like jetliners, so there is a shared prosperity no matter where these durable items are produced. And maybe the Trump response is just a maturity of accepting that reality. 

 

Or, if you gravitate towards conspiracy like I do, you note that Kushner Companies, owned by the son in law of Donald Trump, made deals with China for more business in an unseemly manifestation of greed and selfishness that seems to permeate the politics of both political parties these days. As the New York Times has said:

1 2
View single page >> |
Disclaimer: This and other personal blog posts are not reviewed, monitored or endorsed by TalkMarkets. The content is solely the view of the author and TalkMarkets is not responsible for the content of this post in any way. Our curated content which is handpicked by our editorial team may be viewed here.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.