Will Phillips Curve Revenge Trigger Inflation?
Milton Friedman promulgated the Phillips Curve interpretation that posits a tight labor market generates higher inflation. Since 1967 this has been the primary tool of Central Banks and economists in forecasting inflation. During the previous generation, it appeared that falling unemployment during an economic recovery would always trigger a strong inflation response. Today’s near-record low unemployment should support a robust economic expansion but has confounded economists expecting worrisome inflation. The inflation to unemployment sensitivity was strong in the 1960’s and 1970’s as Boomers entered the workforce triggering abnormal rates of spending and inflation. Combined with the Vietnam War and Johnson’s 1964 War on Poverty, this inflationary Boomer phase caused the US to close the Gold window in 1973 and send the world to free-floating currencies. Pent-up pricing pressures devalued the US Dollar and prompted the infamous Mideast Oil Embargo causing a vicious phase of stagflation until Volker took charge of monetary policy in 1979.
(Click on image to enlarge)
Since Volker’s tight monetary policy of the 1980’s, the unemployment to inflation correlation has been far less acute. The record surge in job seekers in the 1970’s has been replaced by the record surge in job openings today which intuitively should trigger wage inflation. Wages are accelerating at a healthy 3% clip, but higher wages will not create workers that don’t exist.
(Click on image to enlarge)
Record unfilled job openings have boosted job confidence (Quit rate) to 17-year highs, as more workers are willing to quit their job for a better offer. With a very strong GDP and workers trading up for better paychecks inflation is edging higher. Interest rates are rising, not because of inflation fears, but to provide the Fed with ammunition to ease credit when the next recession becomes evident.
(Click on image to enlarge)
The inflation metric using core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) by Fed Chairman Powell may move above target temporarily to the 2.2 to 2.5% range as wages, tariffs and a record labor shortage temporarily move prices higher. However, we concur with the Fed that core PCE inflation will remain subdued longer term. Until we see the global economy accelerating in sync along with Emerging Markets and higher commodity prices, we would not be too concerned about a credit tightening contraction. As in the 1990’s when inflation remained low throughout the long expansion, we will be watching credit spreads, delinquency rates, and banking surveys to provide clues for the end of this record economic expansion cycle. The metrics we watch are in excellent shape today and indications are that historical relationships of unemployment and inflation, as well as inverted yield curves, are less important to the economy than in past decades.
Disclaimer: This report may contain information on investments that are high risk and have substantial risk of principal loss. It is for informational purposes only. Statements in this communication ...
more
The current #unemployment number is much weaker and reliable than total percentage of people employed and is certainly less of a reliable indicator to inflation or economic problems than default rates and other metrics as the author points out. Watch the facts not what is convenient to get a real gauge on inflation and market risk. Oil and trade wars are the most likely to cause inflation and default rates and unhealthy debt are currently the most likely to cause a market crash.