Rising Interest Rates: Never Say Never

An interesting email was circulated my way from a client over the weekend. The title of the post is “Why We’ll Never See “Normal” Interest Rates Again” and it is basically a synopsis on the long history of falling rates by the folks at Investment U. 

While I don’t intend to dispute the author’s claims, I think that it perfectly encapsulates the sentiment and one-directional thinking about bonds at the moment. It also breaks a cardinal rule in the markets: never say never.

When you look at a long-term chart of U.S. Treasury bond yields, the trend pattern is readily accepted. The deeper you go back, the milder each correction becomes until they are like tiny blips on the screen.

That same phenomenon can be applied to the stock market as well. If you look at a 50-year chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (below), seemingly huge events like the 1987 crash, 2000 tech bubble, and 2008 financial crisis look like little speed bumps. We all know how devastating those events truly were and how investors reacted in the face of those moments.

dow-jones-50-year-historical-chart-2016-07-10-macrotrends

*source: macrotrends.net

It’s funny because if someone wrote “Why Stocks Will Never Again Go Down”, it would be derided as a ridiculous fantasy. Yet if someone tells you that interest rates will never rise to a “normal” level again, it’s thought to be fairly rational.

There seems to be a perception that bonds don’t lose money. That they can’t possibly go down given global headwinds, central bank intervention, and other exogenous factors. That’s a myth. If a vehicle like the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) can rise 22% in the last year, it can just as easily fall 22%.

Remember the taper tantrum just a few years ago? TLT fell 20% from July 2012 through August 2013. Interest rates (and by extension bond prices) will see their prices ebb and flow just like any other asset class. There is no secret guiding principle that says interest rates will fall forever.

tlt

I’m not here to scare you into selling all your bonds or invest in rising rate funds. Those are extreme measures that are typically espoused by people seeking headlines or with very little skin in the game.

I own a ton of bond funds for myself and my clients. They have been very good to us both in their capital appreciation and the ability to help absorb volatility in other asset classes. In my opinion, most investors should have a core bond allocation as part of a diversified portfolio.

The lesson I would rather impart is to not assume an existing trend will extend indefinitely into the future. The moment you say “this stock will never fall” or “this correlation will never fail” or “I love this investment”, it will turn on you.

By keeping a rational and balanced perspective, you can avoid the emotional roller coaster that will decimate your confidence and drag on your returns.

Remember to always stay humble or the markets will do it for you.

Disclosure: At the time this article was written, the author owned shares of EUFN. 

The views and opinions ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

David Reynolds 8 years ago Member's comment

Thanks for the share @[David Fabian](user:5048), I enjoyed this post and the comment stream.

Michele Schneider 8 years ago Contributor's comment

I completely agree and in fact, watch patiently for the signal to buy the ultrashort TBT!

Gary Tanashian 8 years ago Contributor's comment

Ditto. We are in a hysteria phase in bonds now. The thing about hysterias though, is that they are impossible to call re. a top. I suspect that watching TIP vs. TLT or the Fed's 'breakeven' spreads will give a clue when inflation is about to begin eating away at bonds.

Michele Schneider 8 years ago Contributor's comment

Possible makings of an island top today in TLT-but my instincts says wait another day for confirm-looks too easy in a sense

Gary Anderson 8 years ago Contributor's comment

I don't believe that Gary. If we suddenly need less collateral (and less demand for bonds) in the derivatives world, then you may be right. I wish you would offer proof, because both Larry Summers and Jamie Dimon believe there is a shortage of collateral in the world.

Gary Tanashian 8 years ago Contributor's comment

Well Gary, I would just ask this question... what, in this market, is proof? See Wonderland, which I just published. www.talkmarkets.com/content/wonderland?post=99867. The point being that we have scores of indicators that normally don't align doing just that right now. In a dysfunctional system I don't think there is proof. But what I do see for sure is the 'prices paid' of US manufacturers rising, the Semi Equipment sector firming a now 3 month trend in increasing bookings, a US jobs report that made a comeback as expected and the Fed acting like it is September 2008, which is off base, i.e. behind the curve. Also, I have used Larry Summers as a wonderful contrary indicator for years. I neither trust nor respect him.

Gary Anderson 8 years ago Contributor's comment

I am not a fan of Larry Summers, Gary. I view him as a globalist mole. But, this collateral thing has some people at the top very concerned. I am thinking that ultimately, derivatives markets are gobbling up massive resources, ie collateral. I agree that deflation may end up being a problem, but the #Fed scares everyone about inflation so they buy, you guessed it, derivatives protection! I am a tin foil guy in the sense that I believe this framework of derivatives and its collateral is a conspiracy of sorts. It has been engineered into reality. But it could have weaknesses, mainly in the ability to supply enough collateral. That seems to be a potential weakness in an otherwise diabolically ingenious system, created mostly by Greenspan.