In the theatre of Japanese politics, resignation is less a shock than a ritual—a blade drawn cleanly across the political stage when a leader has lost the mandate of momentum. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has chosen this path, bowing out after back-to-back electoral bruisings. On paper, his departure was long anticipated; in practice, the moment carries a jolt of risk for traders, because the question of “who comes next” is far more market-sensitive than the act of him stepping aside.

When markets reopened in Wellington, NZ at 4 a.m., the yen told the story first—sliding as much as 0.7% to ¥148.42 against the dollar( currently 148.25), one of the weakest G10 performers on the board. Currencies are political lie detectors: they don’t wait for party conventions or policy papers, they move the instant uncertainty widens. The bond market will be next in line to deliver judgment, especially the ultra-long JGBs that sit at the far end of the maturity spectrum. These instruments are fiscal seismographs, and with Ishiba—one of the last credible defenders of fiscal discipline—vacating the field, the tremors are already spreading.

Ishiba had argued for spending, yes, but always with the restraint of a bookkeeper who refused to issue new debt to fund it. Strip that away, and what’s left is an open question: will his successor unleash larger stimulus, and in doing so trigger more issuance, more debt, more bond selling? Traders know where the pressure points lie. Long yields are expected to climb, dragging the curve into a steepening pattern. Stocks, meanwhile, sit in the middle of cross-currents—squeezed between the sugar high of potential fiscal largesse and the hangover of higher yields.

When it comes to succession, Sanae Takaichi stands out not only as a frontrunner but as the ideological heir to Abenomics. She came second in the last leadership race and makes no secret of her support for the old mix of loose fiscal spending and ultra-easy monetary policy. For markets, that legacy is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it conjures the promise of fresh stimulus and a BOJ kept on a short leash, a combination that traders instinctively price as yen-negative and JGB-toxic. On the other hand, the political climate has shifted since Abe’s heyday: higher inflation—one of the very forces that eroded the LDP’s standing in the Upper House election—has left voters wary of another dose of policy sugar.

That contradiction matters. Takaichi may be viewed by investors as the most bond-bearish option, but the LDP itself could be reluctant to hand her the keys precisely because her policy toolkit reads like a rerun of Abe’s era. That creates a disconnect: traders will prepare for the Abenomics revival trade, even as party calculus suggests her chances might not be as bulletproof as the market assumes. If she does prevail, the risks are clear—steeper yield curves, heavier JGB selling, and a yen left vulnerable to another leg of depreciation. If she stumbles, the market’s reflexive Abenomics trade could unwind just as fast.

Koizumi or Hayashi, by contrast, would likely mean a return to smoother waters. Neither is expected to push the fiscal accelerator too far, and their stance could allow the yield curve to normalize. Yet even their candidacies leave one lingering unknown: how tolerant will the next leader be of the Bank of Japan’s tentative tightening? If Ishiba was grudgingly accepting of rate hikes, the wrong successor could be outright hostile. That matters because resistance at the political level could cap mid-curve yields, even as the long end sells off, exaggerating the steepener.

Japanese politics has always blended the ceremonial with the consequential, and Ishiba’s resignation is no exception. The ritual itself was predictable; the aftershocks are not. For traders, this is no longer a story about one man leaving but about the fiscal and monetary collision course that could follow. The yen is already sniffing weakness, bonds are bracing for a selloff, and equities are poised for chop. Tokyo has entered a vacuum of leadership, and in markets, vacuums don’t stay empty—they get filled with volatility.

More By This Author:

The Week Ahead: Bad News—Still A Lifeline, Or Becoming A Lead Weight?
The Weekender: Bad News No Longer Tastes Like Comfort Food For Wall Street
Wall Street Dances On The Edge Of A Jobs Cliff