Sending prayers to the victims and families affected by the heartbreaking tragedy in Vancouver. Eleven lives were lost after a car drove into a street festival crowd — an unimaginable loss for a community that was simply coming together to celebrate. May strength, healing, and peace find all those grieving in the days ahead.

Take a Deep Breath, Folks

Markets grabbed a tactical lifeline last week as the White House pulled back from the brink — stepping away from the Powell firing circus and tossing out soft whispers about rolling back some tariffs. But let’s not kid ourselves: this isn’t a clean pivot. It’s hope and narrative management, plain and simple. What’s really driving the bounce isn’t hard policy action — it’s the perception of de-escalation. Term sheets and memoranda of understanding are starting to circulate, but they are light on enforceable details. If anything, it’s classic Trump 1.0 trade theatre: outline vague frameworks, buy headlines for time, and kick the real negotiations down the road.

Tariff reductions were always the low-hanging fruit — easy wins that can be spun as victories without making massive structural concessions. Quota agreements for commodities and manufactured goods? Doable, but patchy depending on the sector. But the heavier lifts, like tackling non-tariff barriers or walking back full-on restrictions against China, remain stalled. Even now, there's no real path forward on the tech decoupling front — and that’s where the real strategic battle is being fought. Behind the soothing rhetoric, the U.S. is still drawing hard lines on EVs, AI, and chips. So while a handful of tariff tweaks might juice risk sentiment short-term, they don’t rewrite the bigger strategic fracture.

India looks poised to be the first test case. The chatter says Delhi could ink a deal lowering tariffs — easy to do when your inbound rate on U.S. goods is 12% and your economy can still soak it. Plus, tossing in some military purchases and Apple’s production shift headlines gives both sides something to brag about. Markets will likely celebrate the optics, but if all we’re doing is rerouting supply chains from China to India or Vietnam without materially boosting U.S. production, it’s a shell game — not real reindustrialization.

Meanwhile, the freight and inventory side of the US   And even if deals are announced, the damage done to logistics pipelines will take quarters, not months, to fix. Multinationals are already laying the groundwork for long-term workarounds — gaming country-of-origin rules, shifting light assembly offshore to slip through tariff nets. The cat-and-mouse game is well underway, and it's going to keep undercutting clean headlines about “winning the trade war.”

Bottom line: enjoy the relief rally if you must, but don’t lose sight of where we are. This isn’t a real end to the trade shocks — it’s the beginning of a messy, complicated, global reordering. Tactical squeezes are fine for day traders. But for bigger, strategic flows? It's still a risk-on, risk-off market where every headline, every leak, every failed negotiation will have to be traded, not trusted.

Nowhere to Hide

If this trade war keeps grinding on, cash might be the last safe haven standing. Hedge fund flows are already flashing early warning signs: PB data shows the smart money is quietly unwinding European longs, realizing that the guns-versus-butter stimulus fantasy is still a long way off. And it’s not much better in Asia either.

Sure, the tape got a quick sugar high last week when whispers of a tariff thaw hit—talk of China maybe dialing back some duties. But let's be real: nobody serious is backing up the truck into China right now. Not after getting smoked twice in this cycle. A 2% pop in Hong Kong’s big-cap index didn’t change the fact that Chinese equities are still one of Asia’s worst dogs since the April 2 tariff broadside.

The dry-up in inbound flows to U.S. assets? Sure, it’s helped Japan, Europe, and a few ASEAN names ride the rotation — but China? Still radioactive. Global funds aren’t even close to stepping back in. Too much noise, too much headline whiplash, and way too much political risk still hovering like smog.

The fear isn’t just about tariffs anymore. It’s the slow-motion economic decoupling from the U.S., industrial supply chains breaking apart, and a domestic economy where stimulus isn’t landing like it used to.

Beijing’s trying to put on a brave face — talking up emergency plans, shiny new monetary tools, and policy financing lifelines. But behind the curtain? Growth is stalling out hard. Q2 GDP is limping toward stall speed, and equity targets are getting slashed across the board.

Even local players aren’t fooled. Flow data shows no real pickup in inbound buying, despite bargain-hunter chatter and National Team backstops lurking in the background. Every pop finds selling pressure almost immediately — even with sell controls in place. Traders are treating China as optionality, not conviction. The setup remains a brutal tug-of-war: fast money trying to fade every bounce while dip-buyers nervously nibble. It's chop city, not a real trend.

Zoom out, and the bigger story is impossible to miss. This isn’t just a tariff spat anymore — it’s geopolitical gravity doing what it always does. Decoupling is happening. Industrial chains are moving. Big multinationals aren’t just “talking” about diversification anymore — they’re executing it. Apple shifting iPhone production out of China isn’t a bluff — it’s a full-blown supply chain realignment.

So sure, some are trying to frame this recent selloff as a buying opportunity. Some desks are still trying to pitch the DeepSeek upside fantasy. Maybe there’s a tactical trade in there for the quick and the brave. But long-term allocators? They’re still staring down the barrel of a structural break — not just tariffs, but the slow, grinding severing of ties between the world’s two largest economies.

To Hedge or Repatriate?

Since stepping away from the institutional grind six years ago, my focus has been simple: invest in stock markets where I expect the currency to appreciate. It’s a clean macro strategy — and while there have been some great short-term trades across Asia, it’s also been a humbling reminder that complacency kills. China, of course, has never been a play for this model — the yuan is effectively pegged, and you can't ride what doesn’t float.

For years, the real money trade for investors sitting in London, Paris, and Tokyo was almost embarrassingly easy: buy dollars, plow the proceeds into the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, sit back. US stocks beat everything, and a rising dollar magnified the returns. It wasn’t just a home run — it was an entire decade of moonshots.

But when President Trump lit the fuse on the global trade war, both legs of that trade blew up almost overnight. A simple 6% dip in the S&P ballooned into a 14% wipeout for euro- and yen-based investors, once you layered on FX losses. Suddenly, the "safe haven" narrative cracked. What we’ve entered is what I call the doubt bubble: stocks might or might not rally, but the underlying currency bleeds regardless. You're stuck between two bad choices: stay unhedged and watch returns erode… or hedge the currency risk at premiums that are becoming brutally expensive, and watch your S&P 500 stock index slide or do little this year (maybe +2 %?) Either way, the math isn't pretty, and for many, the cut-and-run button is getting harder to ignore the fact that it might simply be better to bring capital back home.

The dollar isn’t crashing — it’s unwinding in slow motion. But look closely: the cracks are no longer sentiment-driven. The convexity is in the data now. U.S. GDP expectations have been slashed — from 2.5% to 1.3% — while Europe, despite its flaws, has barely budged. The global growth gap that kept the dollar bid since 2009 is reversing — and that's just the surface story.

The real slow-burn risk? The tidal wave of two to three trillion dollars' worth of unhedged USD assets sitting in global portfolios. Assets that are now rotting on the vine. If even a sliver of that capital shifts — whether through hedging programs or outright repatriation — it’s a structural dollar sell-off that could stretch months, maybe years.

Early signs say it’s already started. And this isn’t hot money flipping daily flows — this is C-suites and Japanese Fund CIOS quietly moving the risk management chess pieces behind the scenes. Slow, invisible, relentless.

After what was tantamount to a dovish pivot from the Fed — with Powell, as always, staying carefully non-committal — several Fed officials wasted no time lobbing a live-fire June rate cut into the narrative. Fed Governor Waller practically drew the blueprint: if the labor market starts to wobble, the Fed will be ready to cut.

Fast-forward to this week, and Friday’s NFP report now sits squarely at the critical inflection point.

Make no mistake: Friday’s jobs print could be the Fed’s kill switch. Tariff noise and soft consumer data might not be enough to force Powell’s hand, but a headline spike in joblessness? That will. Warning signs are already blinking: government layoffs are now outpacing private-sector hires.

If we get a sub-100k payroll print — or worse — it’ll torch whatever’s left of the "higher-for-longer" narrative. Rate-cut expectations will skyrocket, and the dollar will buckle under the weight.

The market’s fuse is lit — now it’s just waiting for the spark.

The View

Tell me: when was the last time you saw a dominant market narrative, so deeply entrenched, flip inside out this violently? For over a decade, U.S. exceptionalism wasn’t just a theme — it was the gravitational pull every asset class orbited. It began as a slow burn after 2009, went full rocket mode during COVID, and reached peak hubris at Davos earlier this year, when American dominance felt almost unshakeable. But the last few months? They’ve shattered that illusion. We’re not just pivoting anymore — we’re trading the mirror image of the past decade.

And make no mistake: trading the late innings of a bull market is hard. Trading the full inversion of a global narrative? That’s a whole different beast. Every instinct, every model, every "safe playbook" feels just a little off — because it is.

Day-to-day, the news flow feels almost surreal. Last month, we were staring down the barrel of policy chaos — the White House taking shots at Powell, tariff escalation with China, Treasury yields cracking under pressure. Fast forward a few weeks? Softer rhetoric, hints of detente, Powell’s job safe (for now), and muted signals from Beijing. It’s not a grand bargain — not even close. But in a twitchy, headline-driven tape like this, tone shifts are gasoline.

Technicals are confirming the shift. After two months of relentless liquidation, the flow dynamics are finally tilting. Systematic funds have quietly flipped from net sellers to cautious buyers. Discretionary traders are nibbling back in. The long-only crowd — which had been unloading into every rally — has stopped bleeding out. Earnings season is helping. Corporate buybacks are trickling back into the tape. It's not a rip-roaring bull setup — but it’s no longer a death march either.

Macro-wise, it's still a minefield. The tug-of-war between "tentative trade détente" and "incipient recession" is real — and it's nowhere near resolved. Economic data remains noisy, polluted by front-loading and residual COVID distortions. Until we see a hard, verifiable tariff rollback, the growth story is skating on thin ice.

The bottom line? The market’s stopped panicking, but it hasn’t started trusting. Every rally needs a reality check. Every pullback needs to be weighed against positioning, not just headlines. This isn’t trading the echo of the past — it’s trading the inversion

More By This Author:

Alpha Or Exit? Volatility Set To Trade Both Noise And Hard Data
Deal Or No Deal? The Journey To Get There? That’s Still A Grinder
New York Close : Fed Waller Blinks, Trump Winks, And The Rally Finds Room To Run