What “Fund Expenses” Really Mean For Your Returns

person using MacBook Pro on table

Image Source: Unsplash
 

I get a lot of questions about fund expenses. It usually occurs when I recommend a new fund, and I get something like, “What do you think about the 2% expense rate?” Many investors have misconceptions about fund expenses.

So let me explain – because they can matter much less than people think…

The discussion about expenses began with the advent of index-tracking mutual funds and exchange-traded fund (ETFs) in the 1970s and 1980s. The theory was that since actively managed funds generally didn’t outperform the broad market index mutual funds, index-tracking funds with very low expense ratios would outperform the average actively managed funds over the long term.

For reference, actively managed funds have annual expenses of 1.0% of assets or higher.

Index funds (mutual or ETF) track a specified index, such as the S&P 500. They own shares to match the index weighting, so no portfolio management is involved. These funds have expenses starting below 0.10%, depending on the tracked index. At this level, we are talking about basis points or 1/100th of a percentage point.

Index fund sponsors compete on differences of a few basis points.

Fund marketers like to push low expense ratios as a path to above-average returns. They often make it sound as if investors pay expenses directly. For example, if someone owns a fund with a 1% expense rate, the fund or their broker will take 1% of the fund value at some point.

That belief is not accurate. Investors do not directly pay the expenses quoted for a fund, either index or actively managed.

Fund returns are always net of expenses. Put another way; the expenses are already included in the results published by a fund sponsor or in the results and returns you earn in your brokerage account.

I like to find and recommend actively managed ETFs that will outperform their passive, index-tracking competitors.

MLP funds are a good example. The Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) tracks the Alerian MLP index and has an expense ratio of 0.85%. The InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is actively managed and has expenses of 1.64%.

MLPs have performed very well for the last few years. Over the previous three years, since January 1, 2021, AMLP posted a total return of 119%. For the same period, AMZA was up 156%. It was worth it, and then some, to invest in AMZA despite its higher expenses.


More By This Author:

Making Money With Higher-For-Longer Interest Rates
Prepare For The Inevitable Bounce In Natural Gas Prices
Another Covered Call ETF Lands – But Is It Any Good?

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is neither an offer nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security, options on equities, or cryptocurrency. Investors Alley Corp. and its ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.