Fed’s Bostic: Still Comfortable Leaning Into Tight Labor Markets
I have argued for a while that as long as the labor market remains tight with low unemployment, the Federal Reserve will press as far as it dares on its cycle of monetary tightening. Raphael Bostic, CEO of the Atlanta Federal Reserve (and currently a non-voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee), confirmed that strategy during a recent interview with Marketplace.
Don’t Come Crying to the Fed Anytime Soon
Bostic definitively stated that the Fed is so determined to press against inflation that it will likely turn a deaf ear to those who will ask for easier monetary conditions the moment the labor market delivers bad news. Emphasis mine:
“You know, as we get further into inflation getting, closer to our target, I’m expecting we’re going to see stresses in labor markets. We’ve not really seen that. And when that starts to happen, people are going to be looking to us to try to do something about that as well, and maybe turn away from our focus on inflation. But we can’t do that, because failing in getting the inflation back to the 2% target will be much more problematic for the economy. And so as people start to call out for action to provide relief in labor markets, I think what we’re going to have to do is just stay laser focused on the fact that, you know, our employment mandate goal, we are very, very close to that right now. And we’re not close to that in inflation. So we have to stay focused on inflation.”
The bad news for the labor market has been long anticipated and stubbornly absent for the people who keep expecting a recession at every turn of the calendar. This “lagging indicator” of economic health just keeps chugging along. Even a recent uptick in initial unemployment claims above 240,000 fizzled out before the “I told you so’s” could drape the economic headlines. The 251,000 in weekly initial claims from January, 2022 stands as the latest high. For now, initial claims continues to tell the same message week after week after week: the Fed has room to hike if inflation remains an issue. Rate cuts are certainly nowhere on the horizon from this vantage point.
(Click on image to enlarge)
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration, Initial Claims [ICSA], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; May 25, 2023.
Given this data and Bostic’s determination to ignore anyone who wants the Fed to cut rates into an inflationary environment, I understand Bostic’s best guess target for rate cuts set a year or more out from now.
“My best case is that we won’t be thinking about a cut until well into 2024. And, you know, inflation is just double what our target is by just about every measure. I don’t see scenarios where the economy is going to evolve in a way such that inflation gets close enough to our target where we might contemplate any kind of cut.”
As of the time of writing, Fed fund futures have acquiesced to the likelihood of another rate cut by July. However, they still eagerly anticipate rate cuts as soon as November. By the time Bostic guesses the Fed will think about cuts, the futures think the Fed will have 6 or 7 rate cuts in the books. The persistently wide gulf between Fed and market expectations on rate policy remains one of the more remarkable features of today’s financial markets.
Fresh Wind for the U.S. Dollar
The market’s push for another rate hike has helped the U.S. dollar regain momentum. Strength particularly against the euro and the Japanese yen has the dollar index (DXY) bouncing off its lows for the year. I am riding this momentum as long as it holds up. If the rally continues from here, I expect fresh resistance at the year’s high which should also coincide at the time with critical resistance from the 200-day moving average (DMA) (the bluish line below).
(Click on image to enlarge)
Source: TradingView.com
Be careful out there!
More By This Author:
Reserve Bank Of Australia Revives The Ghost Of Inflation Past
A Golden Inflation Conundrum
Don’t Blame The Fed: The Fed Gives Us What We Want
Correction: "As of the time of writing, Fed fund futures have acquiesced to the likelihood of another rate cut by July" should be "As of the time of writing, Fed fund futures have acquiesced to the likelihood of another rate hike by July."