
On Friday, in his Jackson Hole Virtual speech Monetary Policy in the Time of Covid, Powell made statements on QE that caught my eye.
At the FOMC's recent July meeting, I was of the view, as were most participants, that if the economy evolved broadly as anticipated, it could be appropriate to start reducing the pace of asset purchases this year.
We will be carefully assessing incoming data and the evolving risks. Even after our asset purchases end, our elevated holdings of longer-term securities will continue to support accommodative financial conditions.
For How Long?
Here's a hint: QE is not money that was spent, is about to be spent, or ever will get spent.
I discussed the QE misconception at length in Will the Fed Balance Sheet Get Spent into Circulation Causing Inflation?
The BIS is in agreement.
Unconventional Monetary Policies
(Click on image to enlarge)

The above image was taken from the BIS article Unconventional Monetary Policies.
Key Points
- Reserves do not play into bank lending decisions
- The main constraint on expansion of credit is minimum capital requirements.
- There is nothing inherently inflationary about large reserves.
Point 3 is interesting. While the Fed is building its balance sheet it is fostering inflation by fostering asset bubbles.
Q: But what happens when the Fed stops?
A: Banks have large reserves that do not figure into lending decisions at all.
Those reserves are not spendable. And banks conveniently sit back and collect free money on those reserves parked at the Fed.
Explaining Powell's Hesitance to Set a Date
- Traders will front-run the Fed if the Fed gives a date. The prior "Taper Tantrums" reflect that point.
- Powell's phrase "could be appropriate to start reducing the pace of asset purchases this year" was purposely noncommittal to avoid taper tantrums.
To answer the key question, the moment the Fed tapers and perhaps even the moment the Fed stops asset purchases, that huge multi-trillion QE stops being accommodative.
Taking Powell's statements at face value, I doubt the Fed understands that point.
And if interest rates start to rise beyond what the Fed pegs, the Fed will have a hell of a time tapering.
Meanwhile, the debate over transitory is still ongoing. Much will depend on precisely what Congress does with $3.5 trillion in new spending and the energy tax the Progressives want.




Comments
Log in or sign up to join the conversation.