In Narcos—one of my favorite shows of all time—the cartel headed by Pablo Escobar famously reduces the entire narrative to three words: Plata o plomo—silver or lead. Now, I am not encouraging any violence here, but the market sometimes chooses plomo for good companies based on misconceptions, and Autodesk (ADSK) appears to be one of them.
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Autodesk is an engineering software company operating under a software-as-a-service model. It provides specialized cloud and desktop tools across architecture, engineering and construction, manufacturing and product design, and media and entertainment.
The company offers well-known products such as AutoCAD, Revit, Fusion, and Civil 3D for day-to-day engineering and design work. One could argue that Autodesk, along with a handful of other companies, forms part of the digital backbone supporting the physical infrastructure ecosystem in today’s world.
Recently, Autodesk made the strategic decision to acquire MaintainX for $3.6 billion. It is one of the largest acquisitions the company has made in recent years, eclipsing the approximately $1 billion it paid for Innovyze in 2021.
The primary rationale behind the acquisition is that MaintainX could help Autodesk bridge the gap between design and engineering implementation and the daily maintenance and operation of physical assets.
Although this acquisition has made the company more vertically integrated across its product offerings, the market reacted in its usual manner—punishing the stock with a decline of nearly 7% and pushing it to a year-to-date low of $187.50.
The market’s concern appears to be centered on the acquisition price and financing structure. Autodesk paid approximately $1.6 billion in cash, with the remainder funded through new debt financing, including a loan facility and an increase in its revolving credit facility.
At the time of writing, Autodesk shares trade at approximately $206.50, giving the company a market capitalization of roughly $43.46 billion on a fully diluted share basis.
The company trades at a fiscal 2027 forward non-GAAP P/E of approximately 16.4 times, representing a significant discount to its more typical forward P/E range of approximately 28 to 32 times.
Autodesk is trading near one of its lowest forward valuation multiples in recent years, raising an important question: has the investment thesis broken?
My answer is no.
If we look purely at the financials—and I will come to everyone’s favorite word, “AI,” later—the company is projecting revenue of approximately $8.155 billion to $8.215 billion for the year. This implies a growth rate of approximately 11% to 12% relative to fiscal 2026 revenue.
Autodesk’s operating performance over the last four reported quarters
For the second quarter of fiscal 2027, Autodesk has guided for revenue of approximately $2 billion to $2.015 billion, with a non-GAAP operating margin of around 39% and an implied free-cash-flow margin in the range of approximately 33.5% to 34.1%.
The company has modelled operating cash flow of approximately $2.79 billion to $2.87 billion, with capital expenditures of roughly $70 million for the year.
Stock-based compensation continues to remain within what I consider a respectable range of approximately 10% to 12% of revenue. It is still an area investors should monitor, particularly in relation to dilution and the company’s share count, but it does not currently suggest that the underlying business is deteriorating.
If we look purely at the numbers, Autodesk’s business is not breaking down to the extent implied by Mr. Market.
When examining Autodesk’s competitive moat, it becomes clear that the company has one of the stickiest software platforms in the engineering and design industry.
In today’s world, where AI is powering everything from my toaster to Zuckerberg’s Meta (META) glasses, Autodesk—with its array of engineering design tools, including AutoCAD, Fusion, and Revit—remains an essential cog in bringing physical infrastructure to fruition.
University students and professional engineers use these software products daily. Switching to another platform can be difficult because doing so may require employee retraining, changes to established workflows, file conversions, and adjustments across entire organizations.
AutoCAD has also been around for decades, creating a deeply established user base and substantial familiarity among engineers, architects, designers, and construction professionals.
The company does face capable competitors. Dassault Systèmes (DASTY) competes in CAD, CAM, product lifecycle management, and high-end engineering design, while Nemetschek Group and Bentley Systems (BSY) compete in architecture, civil engineering, construction, and infrastructure software.
However, it is fair to say that the scale of Autodesk and Dassault Systèmes overshadows many of the remaining small and mid-sized market participants.
As someone who has worked in the engineering world, I would say that the market is tilted toward Dassault Systèmes on the high-end aerospace and complex industrial design side, whereas Autodesk is particularly strong in civil engineering, architecture, construction, and general mechanical engineering design.
As with any investment, no matter how large the moat is or how sticky the platform may be, there are always variables that could change the investment thesis.
For Autodesk, the main risks include potential headwinds and difficulties associated with integrating the MaintainX acquisition.
The company paid close to 26 to 27 times MaintainX’s annual recurring revenue, as well as a price reportedly equivalent to approximately 35 to 50 times book value. At those multiples, Autodesk must demonstrate that the acquisition can produce meaningful revenue synergies, customer cross-selling opportunities, and long-term operational benefits.
Another risk is that geopolitical tensions remain elevated and inflation returns. Under that scenario, the Federal Reserve may be forced to raise interest rates, which could weaken construction activity, infrastructure financing, and manufacturing investment.
A broader slowdown in construction, manufacturing investment, or infrastructure spending could reduce demand for new Autodesk subscriptions, additional software seats, and customer expansion. It could also pressure renewal rates among current and future customers.
There is also a risk that enthusiasm surrounding AI infrastructure spending begins to lose momentum. If major data-center or infrastructure projects are delayed or cancelled, Autodesk could experience some indirect pressure through weaker activity across its end markets.
Autodesk offers an attractive valuation at approximately 16 times forward earnings, supported by a durable competitive moat and double-digit growth.
Its software remains critical to the design and development of physical infrastructure. With the recent MaintainX acquisition, Autodesk also has an opportunity to expand its presence beyond the design stage and further into the daily operation and maintenance of physical assets.
Management has a solid track record of progressing the business and creating new revenue streams. However, it must now demonstrate that it can successfully integrate MaintainX, control leverage, manage stock-based compensation, and generate sufficient returns to justify the acquisition price.
With its current product portfolio and range of services, I believe Autodesk is uniquely positioned to create meaningful long-term value for shareholders.
As Pablo Escobar said, plata o plomo. In this case, the market chose plomo, while I am choosing the plata—in the form of Autodesk shares.
Comments
Log in or sign up to join the conversation.