The Airbus E-Fan Takes To The Skies

Airbus E-Fan Electric Plane Takes to the Skies

The next generation of airplane technology is upon us.

With the aviation industry being one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gas emissions, it’s striving to reduce its carbon footprint.

And new technology is driving change. In this case, we’re talking about all-electric planes.

There are several inventors and companies in various countries working on the concept. But the most prominent name is Airbus Group (EADSY). It’s investing $22 million into a project that will develop electric planes.

Here’s a look at the “Tesla of the skies…”

Airbus Goes Back to the Future

The E-Fan is 22 feet long, has a 31-foot wingspan, weighs 1,100 pounds when empty, and has a cruising speed of 100 mph.

But, most importantly, the two-seater electric plane emits zero emissions.

It operates entirely on lithium-ion batteries, which power its two 30-kilowatt electric motors. During acceleration and taxiing, a six-kilowatt electric motor in the main wheel provides extra power. This reduces electrical power consumption while on the ground.

And E-Fan doesn’t just boast less environmental pollution. Since taking its first flight in March 2014, Airbus has shown off the E-Fan at various airshows across Europe, with spectators noting a big advantage when it comes to noise pollution. The plane is virtually silent.

On July 10, Airbus made headlines when the E-Fan successfully crossed the English Channel. The flight path mirrored that of Louis Blériot in 1909, the first aviator to cross the Channel.

Here’s a look at the plane…

Airbus E-Fan Electric Plane Takes to the Skies

Click to enlarge

This design is just the beginning, too…

The Future of Aviation – Batteries and Biofuel

As Airbus points out, the Channel crossing was made possible thanks to very recent technological advances.

For example, electric storage capacity – essential to keep the motors running – has jumped by 60%, as the lithium-ion batteries have become more efficient.

In turn, this has increased the time the plane can stay in the sky – from 25 minutes to over 55 minutes.

Over the long term, Airbus sees its electric technology combining with biofuel-powered motors in a hybrid plane. After the batteries have drained, these motors would re-charge the power cells.

The company’s aim is for this plane to carry up to 100 passengers on regional flights within 15 years. It also added that by the middle of the century, such a plane should have a range of at least three hours.

In the shorter term, however, Airbus plans to launch its E-Fan 2.0 in 2017, and have a four-seater electric plane with a gas-powered range extender ready by 2019.

But with such technological progress being made, and a mandate to reduce aviation greenhouse emissions while still maintaining power and range, Airbus obviously isn’t alone in trying to develop electric plane technology…

Other Competitors on the Horizon

As you can imagine, all the big names are involved…

  • In partnership with Cambridge University, Boeing (BA) is working on an electric plane. Last year, its single-seater aircraft took a test flight with an electric motor that’s augmented with a piston engine.
  • NASA is working on a $15-million project to produce its own version of an electric plane, dubbed the X-57.
  • Last year, the Solar Impulse crossed the United States without using a drop of fuel. And Solar Impulse 2 recently made the longest-ever solar-powered flight, going non-stop from Japan to Hawaii. (Unfortunately, the aircraft suffered battery damage and is grounded until April 2016, with the team needing another $22 million to restart its round-the-world mission.)
  • And Airbus was beaten across the English Channel by about 12 hours by a French pilot in a Cri-Cri electric plane.

The question is, with all this innovation, will electric plane technology actually succeed?

Sky-High Potential

The answer most likely is “yes.”

The technology starts with inherent advantages. Electric motors may weigh the same as turbine engines, but are 2.5 times more efficient at converting stored energy into mechanical power. And they’re up to six times more efficient than conventional piston engines.

Needless to say, there’s a very long way to go before a viable electric plane becomes a commercial reality. But the aviation industry’s biggest names wouldn’t be working on the concept if they didn’t think it was realistic.

With electric plane technology specifically, though, the bottom line is that it will advance as fast as Elon Musk and others can push forward new battery technologies. This is happening as we speak – and at the current rate of progress, there’s a good chance that our future will feature all-electric planes that are as commonplace as conventional jet engine-fueled planes are today.

Good investing,

Tim Maverick

Disclosure: None.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Neil Armstrong 7 years ago Member's comment

If the airframe & wings where covered with the latest or future very thin pliable high output solar cells then this plane & others would have much greater range??

Tony Bodle 7 years ago Member's comment

The potential is huge, and so are the Problems, but with modern technology it should be possible.. We have to be aware that the outsourced materials - Electricity / Batteries / Size of planes.. Its a long haul project. If it can be made, the benefits are very high. But in parallel we need to carry the out sourced problems and solution along at the same time, otherwise we are simply moving the problem, not solving it.

Neil Armstrong 7 years ago Member's comment

Very interesting but only for the very rich??

Lars Thomsen 7 years ago Member's comment

Operating costs (fuel and maintenance) of small electric planes will be only 10-20% compared to those of avgas powered single engine piston. And you have virtually no maintance or overhaul costs on the engine(s). So even if the planes will be a little more expensive to buy (maybe 20-50%), they will be very inexpensive to operate. And due to the fact that they are virtually silence, you might be able to fly at hours and places that are closed for SEPs.

Jorge Mt 7 years ago Member's comment

Gives the "LOW-BAT" alert a whole new meaning.

It is a great development. On the other hand, we need to add the carbon footprint of lithium, from mining to recycling. Manufacturing of the cells includes cobalt and powerful solvents. Not only batteries come out of the plant, but slurry. Also, with lower power and shorter autonomy, more flights and stops will be needed. And recharges: how many cycles can these batteries stand? All that has it's own cost in terms of energy efficiency. And money, of course, wich will be paramount for acceptance.

I'm all in favor of dumping oil (pun intended) as an energy source, but do not jump into the happy wagon yet. Airbus et al might be on the right track, but won't go hailing anyone as the Ecological Savior yet. Also, 22 million? Really? How much money do they make from selling just one of one gas guzzling 380?

Francis Sammut 7 years ago Member's comment

Perhaps and most probable, in the near future we might see passenger airliners also taking to the sky!