S&P 500 Index Fails Initial Test

Market Review And Update

Last week's newsletter discussed how the S&P 500 index failed the Santa Claus Rally. To wit:

"With the Santa Claus Rally a no-show, we will now focus on the return for the first five days and the entire month. The old Wall Street axiom says, 'So goes the first five days of January, so goes the month, so goes the year.' Since 1950, there have been only three occurrences when the Santa Rally failed, and the first five days and the month of January were positive. Two out of three years were up over 20%, and 1994 was flat, at -1.5%. The average gain for those 3-years was 14.8%.

Unfortunately, the S&P 500 Index failed that initial test of the New Year by providing a negative return over those first five trading days. As shown in the chart below, the implications of the failure are potentially lower returns for the entire year.

(Click on image to enlarge)

When the S&P 500 index is negative during the first 5 days of the year, it substantially lowers the odds of the year being favorable. Not only do the odds of a positive year decrease, but also the average annual rates of return. However, with that said, while the start of the year has been challenging, we still have a long way to go this year, and many possible outcomes still lie ahead. As such, the markets will focus on the return for January, which, historically, can save the dismal start to the New Year. As Stocktraders Almanac notes:

"Here’s what we found going back to 1938. There were only 13 major errors. Using these 13 major errors, the accuracy ratio is 84.9% for the full 86-year period. Including the 9 flat year errors (less than +/– 5%) the ratio is 74.4% — still effective. For the benefit of the skeptics, the accuracy ratio calculated on the performance of the following 11 months is still solid. Including all errors — major and flat years — the ratio is still a decent 67.4%.
Now for the even better news: In the 52 up Januarys there were only 4 major errors for a 92.3% accuracy ratio. These years went on to post 16.2% average full-year gains and 11.6% February-to-December gains."

(Click on image to enlarge)

Nonetheless, the market has remained rangebound since the highs of December. The market remains on a sell-signal while the overbought conditions, as the RSI shows, are slowly being reduced. Notably, the S&P 500 index has held support at the 20-DMA, which keeps the bullish trend intact.

(Click on image to enlarge)

So, with that bit of optimism, let's review the technical backdrop for both the S&P 500 index and Treasury bonds as we kick off the Q4 earnings season.

 

S&P 500 Index Q4 Earnings Season Coming Soon

On Tuesday, we will discuss the beginning of the Q4-2023 earnings season. As is always the case, Wall Street analysts were particularly aggressive in cutting estimates for Q4 during the last two months of the year.

Such is interesting, given the sharp rally in stocks during the last two months of the year. Unsurprisingly, we will see many companies "beat" Wall Street estimates. Of course, the high beat rate is always the case due to the sharp downward revisions in analysts' estimates as the reporting period begins. The chart below shows the changes for the Q4 earnings period from when analysts provided their first estimates.

(Click on image to enlarge)

This is why we call it "Millennial Earnings Season." Wall Street continuously lowers estimates as the reporting period approaches so "everyone gets a trophy." An easy way to see this is the number of companies beating estimates each quarter, regardless of economic and financial conditions. Since 2000, roughly 70% of companies regularly beat estimates by 5%. Again, that number would be lower if analysts were held to their original estimates.

(Click on image to enlarge)

However, such was the case all last year as earnings were regularly lowered to generate a high beat rate. Even with more dramatic cuts to those estimates, the beat rate fell from 85% in 2020 to 65% last year. At the same time, valuations surged as the market's dramatic price increases outstripped more modest earnings growth.

(Click on image to enlarge)

In other words, investors were willing to pay more for less earnings growth in anticipation of it being made up in the future. However, with economic growth slowing, as seen in much of the economic data as of late, as shown by the Citi Surprise index, those hopes may be disappointed.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Nonetheless, in the short term, the consistent drumbeat of "earnings beats" by companies will help lift the spirits of the markets. While many companies will beat their lowered estimates, investors will focus on the guidance for the rest of the year. As noted in Friday's blog, CEO confidence is not exactly confident.

(Click on image to enlarge)

So, after a rough start to the year, what are the technicals telling us now?

 

S&P 500 Index Technical Review

On a technical basis, the market has been consolidating since December. As we noted previously, the more egregious overbought condition of the market would limit upside gains. Such has indeed been the case. However, the good news is that the market consolidation allows the moving averages to catch up, thereby reducing the deviation in early December. While more work is needed, further consolidation can be accomplished over the next few weeks. Notably, the 50-DMA has turned sharply, supporting more bullish price action in the near term.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Our money-flow indicators are also moving through its correctional process and reversing much of the previous overbought condition. Again, while there appears to be more work ahead, we are likely closer to an opportunity to increase equity exposure than not. Furthermore, as noted above, earnings season could catalyze investors to step back into the markets for now.

(Click on image to enlarge)

On a weekly basis, which smooths out the day-to-day volatility, the market remains overbought on many levels. While such does NOT mean the market can not experience a short-term rally, it suggests that gains may be somewhat limited until those excesses are reversed. That is unless there is another massive injection of capital into the markets, as seen in 2020-21.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Notably, the market trend remains positive, and there is little reason to be overly cautious. While risks lay ahead, the markets will signal if a more defensive positioning is needed. Over the next few weeks, we are looking for what sectors or markets will begin to define themselves as the leaders for this year. Will it be the "Magnificent 7" again, or will last year's laggards, like Healthcare, take center stage?

(Click on image to enlarge)

We are watching the rotation of various factors, courtesy of SimpleVisor.com, to see which will emerge as the next leaders. As is often the case, it most likely won't be what many expect.

 

Bonds Also Looking Better

After a stellar run into year-end, we warned that we could see a pullback in Treasury prices due to more extreme overbought conditions. With the onset of the MACD "sell signal," the Treasury bond market is becoming more appealing for adding exposure. The more severe overbought condition has been worked off to a degree, and we are about halfway through the MACD "sell signal." As represented by TLT below, Treasury bonds are wrestling with the 200-DMA, but the 50-DMA remains in an uptrend.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Notably, the setup for bonds remains bullish as inflation cools and economic growth slows. More importantly, the Federal Reserve suggests they will cut rates this year, putting further downside pressure on yields. The surge in deficit spending and a declining economic composite (GDP, Wages & Inflation) suggest lower yields in the future. Such is particularly true considering that most economic growth has been financed by cheap debt.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Unsurprisingly, the correlation between interest rates, GDP and Inflation is a significant 84%.

(Click on image to enlarge)

As such, our thesis on owning bonds in 2024 remains. As we stated in "Bonds or Stocks,"

"As monetary liquidity reverses and the lag effect of higher interest rates collides with economic realities, the risk of a recession indeed remains prevalent. But, even if the economy does avoid a recession and only slows down, with stocks overvalued and Government bonds deeply undervalued, there is an opportunity for those who can look ahead rather than behind.
The hope is that the Fed will again start dropping interest rates. However, as we have noted previously, the only reason for the Fed to cut rates would be to offset the risk of an economic recession or a financially related event. Should such occur, the “risk off” rotation would cause a drop in rates toward the pandemic-era lows. Such a decline would imply an increase in bond prices of approximately 50%."

In other words, it is possible that given the economic backdrop as we move further into the year, bonds could wind up outperforming the S&P 500 index.

How We Are Trading It

While the sell-off started the year on a soft footing, we have no idea how things will turn out this year. As we noted in "Analysts Are Optimistic," there is a broad range of potential outcomes based on earnings and valuations. As we kick off the New Year, this is a great time to refocus our attention on what the market is doing rather than what we think it should. This is often where we make the most mistakes.

There are undoubtedly many reasons to be pessimistic, but as we discussed previously, we must focus on the range of possibilities and probabilities of macro outcomes. To wit:

"The chart below is a normally distributed 'bell curve' of potential events and outcomes. In simple terms, 68.26% of the time, typical outcomes occur. Economically speaking, such would be a normal recession or the avoidance of a recession. 95.44% of the time, we are most likely dealing with a range of outcomes between a reasonably deep recession and average economic growth rates. However, there is a 2.14% chance that we could see another economic crisis like the 2008 Financial Crisis.

But what about 'economic armageddon?' An event where nothing matters but "gold, beanie weenies, and bunker." is just a 0.14% possibility."

(Click on image to enlarge)

While "fear sells," we must assess the "probabilities" versus "possibilities" of various outcomes.

The reality is that we can't control outcomes; the most we can do is influence the probability of specific outcomes, which is why the day-to-day management of risks and investing based on probabilities rather than possibilities is essential not only to capital preservation but to investment success over time.

As discussed this week, there is little reason to be overly pessimistic about the markets. Such is why we are currently slowly adding to equity exposures opportunistically. However, at the same time, we are controlling our risks and watching the markets for any evidence of a turn in outcomes.

If such occurs, we will begin raising cash immediately.

(Click on image to enlarge)

Have a great week.


More By This Author:

Full-Time Jobs Suggest Recession Risks Higher Than Thought
Markets Missed It "By That Much"
2024 Market & Economic Outlook

Disclaimer: Click here to read the full disclaimer. 

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with