Is Bitcoin “Money” Or Just A New Flavor Of Risk Asset?

The argument that bitcoin (BTC) is money faces an uphill battle. It’s hard to spend in the real world and its value is highly volatile. That doesn’t stop some advocates of the cryptocurrency from insisting that BTC is the coin of the realm. If so, it’s not obvious by running correlation analytics on BTC against several conventional asset classes.

To recite the obvious, BTC is highly volatile and this volatility shows up via correlations. But it’s worse: the correlations for BTC are all over the map, which creates an extra layer of uncertainty. In other words, not only is BTC’s volatility high, factors that appear to influence its movements are highly unstable.

A chart tells the story. I ran correlations on BTC against a set of ETFs representing US stocks generally (SPY), tech shares (XLK), short-term US Treasuries (SHY), gold (GLD), and the US Dollar Index (UUP). The result is a wild ride of continually shifting correlations in recent years. (Note: 1.0 = perfect positive correlation, 0 = no correlation, -1.0 = perfect negative correlation.)

At the moment, US stocks and tech shares show a relatively high degree of correlation with BTC lately. But that compares with a moderately negative correlation before the pandemic.

Meanwhile, Treasuries, gold, and the greenback are negatively correlated (in varying degrees) with BTC lately, although that’s far from a stable relationship, as previous years suggest.

The main takeaway: it’s not obvious what factors are influential for BTC, at least on a relatively persistent basis – a conclusion that echoes my review of the cryptocurrency through a factor-analysis lens.

BTC, in short, doesn’t appear to be money per se. Rather, it’s a strange flavor of a risk asset and one whose profile remains very much in flux.

Disclosures: None.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Sarbelio Jaime 3 months ago Member's comment

In any case, someone could ask:

What is the real value of the BTC to explain its volatility, and what does this mean for some countries (El Salvador for example) which adopted it as a legal tender?.

Michele Grant 3 months ago Member's comment

Personally I think governments need to either regulate #crypto, or ban it.  It's too easy for criminals to get away with their crimes when there is no paper trail.

Sarbelio Jaime 3 months ago Member's comment

I agree, but the market is more strong.

Andrew Armstrong 2 months ago Member's comment

I wouldn't say "Strong." I'd say the crypto market is somtimes strong, sometimes not. In other words, very very volatile! It's not for the faint of heart. 

Sarbelio Jaime 1 month ago Member's comment

Yes, you are right Andrew.

The markets don´t have a heart.😞