How The “Wealth Effect” Fueled Q3 GDP

Person Holding Blue and Clear Ballpoint Pen

Image Source: Pexels


In Q3, personal spending rose 1.6%, or 6.4% annualized, while personal incomes only rose 0.8%, or 3.3% annualized. A little more precisely, personal spending rose 0.75% more than personal incomes.

Just how much more did spending rise than the income to fuel it compared on a historical basis?

In the past 80 years (or 280 quarters), spending only exceeded income by 0.75% or more only 29 times. In other words, in only 10% or all quarters has spending exceeded income so much:

(Click on image to enlarge)


Needless to say, this is not sustainable. This is particularly so when real disposable personal income did not grow at all last quarter, and real personal income excluding government transfer payments has not increased at all in the past two quarters:


As I have written a number of times in the past few months, this is probably spending driven by the “wealth effect” which in turn is driven by stock market gains. 

Unless you think we are headed for AI-driven nirvana, this is not going to last.


More By This Author:

The Low Pace Of Firings Continues To Christmas
Strong Q3 GDP, But Long Leading Components Are Mixed; First Preliminary Positive Signs For Production In October
Two Important Employment Indicators From November: One Says Continued Expansion, The Second Recession
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.