Fat Tails And Expecting The Unexpected

“The world we live in is vastly different from the world we think we live in.” – Nassim Taleb

Given enough time, the market will make a fool out of anyone basing their expectations for the future on a normal (or Gaussian) distribution.

Why?

Because financial markets do not follow a bell curve. Instead, they operate in the world of fat tails, exhibiting large skewness or kurtosis. This is a fancy way of saying extreme events (high standard deviation or “sigma” moves) are much more likely to occur than a normal distribution would predict.

fat1

 

Let’s run through a real-world example in the U.S. equity market to illustrate this point.

Since 1928, there have been 22,230 trading days in the S&P 500. Based on a normal distribution, one would expect a 3-sigma event (a daily gain of >3.52% or a daily loss of >3.49%) to occur roughly .27% of the time, or in only 60 of those trading days.

What we see in the table below is that they have actually occurred 383 times, or 1.72% of the time.

tail1

 

Probability theory would suggest the likelihood of a 5 or more standard deviation event (a daily gain of >5.86% or a daily loss of >5.83%) is essentially zero but in the real world we have seen such extreme moves 85 times.

The 17-sigma crash that occurred on October 19, 1987 (-20.5% decline, worst in history) was simply not every supposed to happen, in the history of the universe.

But it did. And given enough time, it will happen again.

On, June 24, following the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union, we saw that first hand. Fat tails were evident that day throughout the financial markets. The British Pound crash was the most extreme, declining over 8% (double the prior record) but we also saw the worst declines in history for the Spanish, Italian and Euro Stoxx 50 equity indices. In the U.S., the Volatility Index (VIX) jumped close to 50%, one of the largest spikes in history (for our research on leading indicators of volatility, click here).

fat3

 

Could anyone have predicted the exact timing or magnitude of such an extreme day? No, though with hindsight many have attempted to rationalize these enormous moves as if they could have been expected.

In reality, the best we can do as investors is to understand and accept the fact that fat tails are an inherent part of the game. As such, diversification in terms of asset class and strategy is your best defense in dealing with them.

The worst thing you can do is to react emotionally to such extreme events, taking unwarranted action in your portfolio after the fact with the assumption that an ex-post response will be helpful.

But panic selling is rarely rewarded in the short-run and never an effective strategy in the long-run. Those trading the FTSE 100 (UK equity index) after the Brexit vote would learn that the hard way.

fat4

 

Disclaimer: At Pension Partners, we use Bonds as our defensive position in our absolute return strategies for all of the above reasons. Bonds have provided a more ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Moon Kil Woong 8 years ago Contributor's comment

There is much unexpected outcomes indeed. In housing and the stock market, both are outpacing growth and inflation due to the actions of the Federal Reserve.

As for ordinary things, they are biased towards getting cheaper as housing costs rise well above inflation due to the Federal Reserve fueling more upper income inflation to prevent deflation on the low end which is a bit stupid, but that is apparently what they are.

I find it a bit humorous their planned economy socialist leanings are creating the worst income distribution in modern US history. Who would have thought a socialist Federal Reserve head would be so good for elite bankers and so bad for the rest of Americans by halting growth and biasing things towards those who get zirp and everyone else who doesn't.