Coincident Real GDP Metric Is Good, But Leading Indicators From The GDP Report Are Not

Real GDP grew 0.7% in Q2, or a 2.8% annualized rate, a perfectly good number in line with the past three years:

(Click on image to enlarge)


Probably even more importantly, the GDP deflator increased 0.6% for the quarter, or at an annualized rate of 2.3%. As the below graph shows, this is a perfectly normal rate going back to the start of the Millennium:

(Click on image to enlarge)


In other words, if 2% inflation is a target and not a ceiling, the Fed need not wait any further before starting to trim interest rates lower.

And the long leading indicators contained within the GDP report ought to give them more reason to cut, because both declined slightly.

First, private fixed residential investment as a share of GDP, a proxy for the housing market, declined slightly both in nominal (blue) and real (red) comparisons:

(Click on image to enlarge)


This doesn’t scream recession, but the generally flat trend of the past several years (with the supply chain tailwind now gone) at very least suggests lackluster growth ahead.

Secondly, real deflated proprietor’s income, a proxy for corporate profits (which won’t be reported for another month, also declined, by -0.4%:

(Click on image to enlarge)


Business profitability is also not providing any help to the economic outlook for 2025.

Continued resilient real consumer income and spending is keeping the economy growing. But the power sources for that engine are not providing any more juice. 

Again, not recessionary, but more evidence that the Fed should start to lower rates now.


More By This Author:

Jobless Claims Hold Their Ground Against The Most Challenging Comparisons Of Last Summer
7%+ Mortgages Weigh On New Home Sales
Existing Home Market Inventory And Prices Move Slowly Towards Normalization, While Sales Remain Punk

Disclaimer: This blog contains opinions and observations. It is not professional advice in any way, shape or form and should not be construed that way. In other words, buyer beware.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments