SoundHound Stock ‘Remains A High-Risk Investment’ Ahead Of Q3 Earnings Report

black android smartphone turned on screen

Image Source: Unsplash


SoundHound AI Inc (Nasdaq: SOUN) is expected to report $23.68 million in revenue for its third financial quarter on November 12th.

While that translates to an exciting 78% annualized growth, the artificial intelligence company is still projected to lose 8 cents a share – down only marginally from 9 cents per share a year ago.

That’s one of the reasons why analyst Danil Sereda remains “cautious” on SoundHound shares ahead of the earnings release. He finds the valuation of this AI stock “too generous” following a 75% gain over the past two months.


SoundHound stock lacks organic growth

Danil Sereda is dovish on SoundHound as it “has high sales and marketing costs” and is concerned about the company’s reliance on acquisitions to drive growth.

In August, the AI firm spent $80 million to buy Amelia to expand its reach across multiple industries.

But Sereda does not expect the full benefits of that deal to materialize in the near term.

On the other hand, SOUN is “questionable” in terms of organic growth that could stand in the way of it keeping momentum beyond the AI mania, the analyst added as he dubbed organic growth “the most important thing for a growth company” in a recent report.

Danil Sereda is convinced that much of the good news is already priced into SoundHound stock now that it’s trading at more than 4 times its price in early February.  

Note that SOUN shares do not currently pay a dividend to appear any better positioned for healthy total returns either.


SoundHound continues to lose money

Analyst Danil Sereda recommends caution on SoundHound stock also because it’s burning money and is expected to remain in loss for another two years.

He expects operating losses as well as cash outflows to make it a lot more challenging for the management to scale operations.

“SoundHound stock remains a high-risk investment in the medium term because, despite the business expansion, its fundamental issues appear to remain unchanged,” the analyst argued.

Note that SOUN has formed a bearish flag and head and shoulder patterns as well that made our market expert Crispus Nyaga recently forecast a sharp pullback in its shares to $4.0.

The Nasdaq-listed firm could struggle also because giants like Alphabet Inc. are committed to expanding their footprint in its niche voice AI assistant market as well.

Still, Wall Street continues to see potential in SoundHound AI Inc.

Analysts currently have a consensus “buy” rating on the AI firm with D.A. Davidson even calling for an upside to $9.50 which indicates potential for another 34% gain from here.

So, it all comes down to the risk appetite.

If you’re not an aggressive investor who’s comfortable with higher risk in pursuit of higher potential returns, consider sitting this one out.  


More By This Author:

AbbVie Stock Drops 12% On Schizophrenia Drug Setback: Should You Buy The Dip?
Carvana Stock: It’s Time You Moved To The Sidelines
Nvidia Announces New Chips To Run AI Apps On Your Home PC

Disclosure: Invezz is a place where people can find reliable, unbiased information about finance, trading, and investing – but we do not offer financial advice and users should always ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with
Gene Inger 4 weeks ago Contributor's comment
Sorry to say but you are way off. I had the same concerns 2 years ago; not now. And the pattern you reference is non-existent... NO bearish flag or Head & Shoulders bearish pattern exists. I do agree about a setback but that's why there's such high short interest and high premiums both ways. This stock is headed towards double digits regardless of short-term.. I update daily on 'X' where I am @stockseer and once in awhile I permit being quoted here on TalkMarkets (appreciated of course). Well written but disagree and again technical picture vastly different than referenced. Also we like $BBAI.