How Bitcoin Can Resolve COVID-19 Controversies

In these crazy times, truth and accountability are sorely lacking, especially when it comes to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We may never know the true number of patients who were afflicted with or died from COVID-19, because too many of those involved see too much opportunity in manipulating and/or lying about the numbers for selfish gain.

A corporation may want to downplay the pandemic to assure its employees that it is safe to come to work.

A hospital may want to leverage the ‘2nd wave’ as justification for more funding.

A politician may exaggerate the death toll to push a certain policy to get re-elected in office. Thankfully, there’s an app for that. And it’s called Bitcoin.

Bitcoin, which is widely known as a speculative cryptocurrency, was actually designed with accountability in mind and innate properties that can help mitigate these issues.

The transfer of Bitcoins is executed on a public ledger, called a blockchain, which means that anyone can verify the transactions and data for themselves.

Each transaction is stored with a timestamp, which means one can prove the existence of the data at a certain time with an irreversible record of what took place in the past. That stated, this feature does not prove the data is accurate or its truth, but it can be leveraged to hold its publisher accountable.

Source: WhatsOnChain.com

The public nature of the entry is key, since anyone can view what occurred in the past.

Source: https://bitcoinsv.io/bitcoin.pdf

The original whitepaper for Bitcoin states: ‘The timestamp proves the data must have existed at the time, obviously, in order to get into the hash.’

An example of a ‘hash’ is as follows:

781571332aca4da258ffd206f9973efb2503758c357a6954bc5026b073bf078e

This seemingly meaningless jumble of characters represents a Bitcoin transaction ID, which is a unique reference to a payment on the Bitcoin SV ledger. Bitcoin SV is the version of Bitcoin that adheres’ closest to the original protocol, with no limits on block size or placing data (ex. statistics or medical data) inside of a transaction. Thus, only this version is capable of the solutions proposed here.

The hash is important because all the data in a transaction is ‘hashed’ to the value above. Any change to any of the transaction’s values (timestamp, amount transferred, etc.) would yield a completely different hash or transaction ID.

This is why the public nature is so important, because records cannot be tampered with once they are placed onto the ledger. These traits are only possible if the transaction is ‘timestamped and widely’ published per the whitepaper.

To be clear, a single source of truth does not solve these issues as publishers can still lie or make mistakes. What the ledger does provide is an immutable record of who has done what in the past.

For example, if death certificates were issued on the Bitcoin ledger, when doctors add COVID-19 as the cause of death to a patient who had three other deadly pre-existing conditions and end up being wrong—everyone could see the mistake.

This doctor would then be held accountable and can only fix their mistake by appending a correction or standing by it; they cannot delete the mistake. How this incident affects their reputation going forward is up to the public, rather than the mainstream media whose narrative changes like the weather.

Through continued use of the public ledger, reputation is the true value obtained, not the ‘truth’ source. As more data is published from an entity, the interpreters of the data determine its usefulness, validity, and value.

If that publisher is known to provide valuable, referenceable data in the past, they would likely not sully their reputation suddenly just to push a certain agenda. They would find more value in remaining honest, apolitical, and a trusted source of data.

Source

Incentives play a huge role in the market—if a greater financial incentive exists to lie, fear-monger and sow dissent, then doctors, politicians, and the mainstream media will engage in those tactics with impunity.

With Bitcoin, we can have an indisputable record of occurrences in the past, countering the incentives to be dishonest. In the face of a pandemic the question of ‘What are the true numbers?’ would compete in the free market on the public ledger, not based on who can shout the most sensationalist statistics on TV screens or social media sites.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Moon Kil Woong 3 years ago Contributor's comment

If the world used bitcoin regularly the world would be deficient of electricity fairly soon. This alone makes such a solution impossible. Likewise, the world would be a more dangerous place. That's why countries like North Korea hoard it and it is used for criminal activities. Also it is too easy to lose your currency or have it stolen without repercussion. Until these issues are fixed it will remain a small part of global trade and no country will willingly give up their currency for such a scheme. It does however make sense to use crypto keys to encode medical records and property transactions. That said, it would have to changed from currencies for accessibility and proof against losing your pass key. Imagining forgetting your key and realizing you will have no medical history. This would be horrible and tragic.