
Image Source: Pexels
Preliminary benchmark revision takes down March employment by 0.9%. Here’s a picture of various series relevant to the manufacturing sector.
Figure 1: Manufacturing production (blue, left scale), implied employment from preliminary benchmark (tan, left scale), aggregate hours (green, left scale), and real valued added (red), all in logs, 2007M12=0, and capacity utilization in manufacturing, in % (black, right scale). NBER defined peak-to-trough recession dates shaded gray. Note: 2007M12 is NBER’s business cycle peak. Source: BLS via FRED, Federal Reserve, BLS, BEA via FRED, NBER.
With employment and production essentially flat (but below end-2023 peaks), I’d be hard pressed to say manufacturing is in recession, but here recession is in the eye of the beholder (given there’s not a technical definition of recession for a subsector).
Note that GS believes the aggregate (NFP) benchmark revision of -818K is too large; rather, theyu believe that given less than total coverage of QCEW and likely revisions, the aggregate revision is more like -300K. This would suggest a smaller downward revision in manufacturing employment.
More By This Author:
A Puzzle: Private NFP And The Preliminary Benchmark Vs. Current OfficialRecession Before The Election?
Guesses On The Preliminary Benchmark Revision To Nonfarm Payroll Employment





Comments
Log in or sign up to join the conversation.