Jobs Up 275,000 With 52,000 More Government Jobs, Employment Down 184,000

Another seemingly strong jobs headline falls apart on closer scrutiny. The massive divergence between jobs and employment continues.

Nonfarm payrolls and employment levels from the BLS, chart by Mish.

From September 2020 through early 2022, nonfarm payroll job gains and full time employment changes tracked together.

Starting around March of 2022, a divergence between employment and jobs became very noticeable, and I have been discussing the divergence since then. You seldom see this mentioned in mainstream media.

Payrolls vs Employment Gains Since March 2023

  • Nonfarm Payrolls: 2,602,000
  • Employment Level: +144,000
  • Full Time Employment: -284,000

Payrolls vs Employment Gains Since May 2022

  • Nonfarm Payrolls: 5,880,000
  • Employment Level: +2,654,000
  • Full Time Employment:+270,000

Payrolls are up by 5.88 million since May of 2022, but full time employment up only 270 thousand.

No amount of BLS smoothing can hide this, so hardly anyone discusses it.

Q: What’s going on?
A: People are working multiple part time jobs and or semi-retired boomers are working part time.

Job Report Details

  • Nonfarm Payroll: +275,000 to 157,808,000 – Establishment Survey
  • Civilian Non-institutional Population: +171,000 to 267,711,000
  • Civilian Labor Force: +150,000 to 167,426,000 – Household Survey
  • Participation Rate: +0.0 to 62.5% – Household Survey
  • Employment: -184,000 to 160,968,000  Household Survey
  • Unemployment: +344,000 to 6,458,000- Household Survey
  • Baseline Unemployment Rate: +0.2to 3.9% – Household Survey
  • Not in Labor Force: +20,000 to 100,285,000 – Household Survey
  • U-6 unemployment: +0.1 to 7.3% – Household Survey

Nonfarm Payroll Change by Sector

Government and Health Services are related to the surge of illegal immigrants and the need to address them. Social assistance jobs rose by 30,000 in January and another 24,000 in February.

Government jobs rose by 52,000 in both January and February.

Those are additional facts you don’t hear about in mainstream media.

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls January 2022 to February 2024

Monthly Revisions

  • The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for December was revised down by 43,000, from +333,000 to +290,000
  • The change for January was revised down by 124,000, from +353,000 to +229,000.
  • With these revisions, employment in December and January combined is 167,000 lower than previously reported.

Part-Time Jobs

The above numbers never total correctly due to the way the BLS makes seasonal adjustments. I list them as reported.

Hours and Wages

This data is frequently revised.

  • Average weekly hours of all private employees rose 0.1 hours to 34.3 hours.
  • Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees rose 0.2 hours 33.3 hours.
  • Average weekly hours of manufacturers rose 0.1 hour to 39.9 hours marking the fourths consecutive month below 40 hours.

An overall decline or rise of a tenth of an hour does not sound line much, but with employment over 160 million, it’s more significant than it appears at first glance.

Hourly Earnings

This data is also frequently revised. Here are the numbers as reported this month.

Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.05 to $34.57. A year ago the average wage was $33.15. That’s a gain of 4.28%.

Average hourly earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Workers rose $0.07 to $29.71. A year ago the average wage was $28.42. That’s a gain of 4.53%.

Year-over-year wages are keeping up with inflation after underperforming for many months.

Unemployment Rate

BLS unemployment data, chart by Mish

The unemployment rate hit a 50-year low in January and April of 3.4 percent. It’s now 3.9 percent, the highest since December of 2021. A

3.9 percent is still a very low number, but it’s now clear the unemployment rate has bottomed this cycle and will generally head higher.

Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Table A-15 Alternative Measures of Labor, chart from BLS

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

The official unemployment rate is 3.9%.

U-6 is much higher at 7.3%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.

Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. Some dropped out over Covid fears and never returned. Still others took advantage of a strong stock market and retired early.

The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement (need for Social Security income), and discouraged workers.

Birth Death Model

Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.

The birth-death model pertains to the birth and death of corporations not individuals except by implication.

For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.

The model is wrong at economic turning points and is also heavily revised and thus essentially useless.

Birth-Death Methodology Explained

Every month this subject comes up. I gave a detailed explanation of the model and why the hype is wrong in my December 8, 2023 post How Much Did the Huge 412,000 Birth-Death Adjustment Impact October’s Job Report?

The month does not matter. If you think the model has a big impact, please click on the above link for why it doesn’t.

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

  • The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number. It is based on employer reporting.
  • The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures employment, unemployment and other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Looking for job openings on Jooble or Monster or in the want ads does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.

These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.

Employment Revisions to December 2023

Note: This chart is a repeat from last month.

Whereas the BLS revised Jobs for December by +333,000, the BLS revised employment for December by -270,000.

Final Thoughts

This report is much worse than headline numbers indicates. I said the same thing for the last three months, and it’s generally been that way for over a year.

In December, I commented “A decline in full time employment of 1.5 million is remarkable. This series is heavily revised so let’s see what January brings.” 

In January, I commented “We now have an answer. Other than the headline jobs numbers, this report was terrible. There are 353,000 more jobs, but hours worked took an unusual dive. The continued dependence on government jobs, up another 52,000 in December and 36,000 in January also masks weakness.”

For February, the BLS revised January from 353,000 jobs to 229,000 jobs. The string of generally negative revisions has been huge. And once again we have a huge number of government jobs propping up the economy.

Ignore the Amazing Headline Job Numbers, Note the Revisions

Note: This chart is also a repeat from last month.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Revisions-to-total-Nonfarm-Employment-2023-1024x696.png

Can the Jobs and Employment Numbers Both Be Reasonably Correct?

The answer is yes (discounting measurement error) because they measure different things. A person working three part time jobs counts for three jobs but only a single person employed.

I have repeatedly asked ADP to account for duplicate social security numbers but they won’t. Amusingly, the BLS wants to, but the employees tell me they can’t because “they don’t have access to the data for security reasons.”

This is a simple sort-merge program but alas, we depend on a phone survey for employment numbers.

Notably, discrepancies like these don’t last for years unless there is some truth to the employment numbers because measurement errors are random.

Over the past 21 months, payrolls have increased by 5.88 million while full time employment is up a mere 270,00. Democrats cheer this performance and mainstream media fails to note.


More By This Author:

How Are Gold, Climate Change, Bitcoin, And The Fed Related?
Job Openings And Quits Show The Labor Market Has Stabilized, What’s Really Happening?
ISM Services Respondents Share Concerns Over inflation And Employment

Disclaimer: The content on Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with
Stone Fox Capital 9 months ago Contributor's comment

So the Feb. jobs number ends up at 150K after revisions.