Economic War Against A Real Economy

A Yellow excavator truck being loaded at an open pit coal mine.

Tom Fisk/Pexels

The War In Ukraine: Atoms Versus Bits

Judging by the coverage in most of the Western media, Russia is getting soundly beaten in its war with Ukraine. That may be an artifact of the West's (and Ukraine's) superiority at electronic media. The Ukrainian President, Vladimir Zelensky, is, after all, a former television star and producer, who understands media well. And Western media are full of stories of plucky Ukrainian defenders defeating bumbling Russian invaders, such as this article from the Financial Times. 

Some military experts, such as retired U.S. Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor, say that the Russian army never intended to take Kiev, that its forces deployed in the vicinity of Kiev were merely meant to tie down Ukrainian forces. But those experts have been losing the media war along with Russia. 

So much for the media (bits). What about the physical world (atoms)? There, the picture looks starkly different. 

Table showing military equipment lost by Ukraine and Russia, respectively

According to the data above, Ukraine has lost 91% of its tanks since Russia invaded, while Russia has lost 6.9% of its tanks. 

A Similar Dynamic At Work In The Economic War

A similar dynamic may be at work in the West's economic war against Russia. Over the weekend, the Financial Times expressed incredulity that "contrarian" fund manager Dave Iben hadn't written down his position in Gazprom--which has shipped record amounts of gas to Europe throughout the war--to zero. 

Similarly, President Biden quipped after levying unprecedented sanctions on Russia that the ruble was now "rubble", but Russia's currency has already recovered to pre-war levels. 

It appears that the laptop class in the West has underestimated the resilience and size of Russia's economy because it's more based on the physical world than ours is. That observation was fleshed out by French economist Jacques Sapir, as Arnaud Bertrand shared in the Twitter thread below. 

Bertrand then extends this analysis to China and America.

Focusing On The Physical 

If you look at our top names from Friday, our system is not taking the physical world, and the economy based on it, for granted. 

Screen capture via Portfolio Armor on 4/8/2022.

Here's how that top ten breaks down: 

  • Wheat: Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT)
  • Oil & Gas: Occidental Petroleum Corp. (OXY), Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2x Shares (GUSH), and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). 
  • Home solar energy: Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH)
  • Fertilizer: CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF)
  • Coal: Peabody Energy Corp. (BTU)
  • Aluminum: Century Aluminum Co. (CENX)
  • Coffee: iPath, Series B Bloomberg Coffee Subindex Total Return ETF (JO)
  • Gold: VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ)

These are the names our system is putting in portfolios now for the next six months. They're positioned to benefit from the sanctions regime making food and energy more expensive, and in the case of GDXJ, from Russia linking its currency to gold. 

Disclaimer: The Portfolio Armor system is a potentially useful tool but like all tools, it is not designed to replace the services of a licensed financial advisor or your own independent ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.


Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.