Russell 2000, S&P And Nasdaq All Kick On

It would have been nice to see some volume to go with today's buying, but we don't always get what we want. The Russell 2000 pushed into the early year consolidation, breaking well away from the spring/early summer consolidation that had threatened something a lot worse. Technicals for the index are net positive and after a long period of relative underpeformance to the S&P and Nasdaq, it's now the lead index.

The Nasdaq has been enjoying a step-by-step advance since breaking out in May. We need to be a little careful with the relationship of the index to its 200-day MA; at today's close it's 14.9% above this moving average, if it reaches 17%, it will then be trading at a level above 90% of historic price action dating back to 1971. If it gets there it will be an area where taking some profits is often prudent (one can add again on a retest of its 50-day MA).

The S&P managed to close at a new daily high, but the real battle for this index is on the weekly chart.If the index can maintain this level by tomorrow's close it will finish the week bang on resistance, setting up an opportunity for a breakout next week.

One chart I'm watching is one previously offered by J.C. Parets. This looks at the relationship between Discretionary and Staples ETFs. From this chart we are entering a period comparable to 2009 when supporting technicals were emerging from an oversold stated with an existing 'buy' signal in the MACD; just waiting for one in the KST. Just as a note, this is a monthly chart, so it may the latter part of the year before we see the signal. 

(Click on image to enlarge)

Tomorrow's close is important for both daily and weekly timeframes.We don't need a big gain, just one to hold the gains of today. 

More By This Author:

Russell 2000 Continues To Surge
Russell 2000 Breaks Free Of Congestion
S&P "Bull Trap" Negated As Sellers Lose Momentum

Disclaimer: Investors should not act on any information in this article without obtaining specific advice from their financial advisors and should not rely on information herein as the primary ...

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.