In an ever-evolving world, the progress of progress is often heralded as a necessary and beneficial force. However, this transformation comes with costs—both monetary and psychological—that profoundly affect providers and end users alike. The transition of “mother” AT&T’s two-line twisted copper analog phone system to satellite-based digital smartphones serves as a striking example. While the monetary investment in such a shift is staggering, the changes endured by individuals highlight the complex interplay between technological progress and human adaptation.

The Costs of Change: AT&T’s Providers and Users Case Study

AT&T’s transformation from analog phone lines to digital systems required monumental investments:

Infrastructure Replacement: The dismantling of copper-based systems and the deployment of satellite, fiber-optic, and cellular networks.

Research & Development: Innovation to support evolving technologies and market demands.

Dual Maintenance: Supporting both old and new systems during the transition.

The financial burden was immense. For example, AT&T’s fiber-optic expansion efforts alone have been estimated to cost billions of dollars annually. The legacy analog systems, while limited in functionality, were predictable, affordable, and offered ubiquitous coverage. By contrast, the new digital ecosystem shifts costs significantly to users:

Device Costs: Smartphones often cost hundreds to over a thousand dollars, compared to the negligible cost of analog phones.

Service Plans: Recurring monthly fees for data and voice plans, often are far higher than the simple, low-cost analog service.

Exclusion Risks: Rural and underserved communities often face limited or no digital coverage, despite paying comparable costs.

The psychological costs are equally pronounced. Users lament the loss of reliability, simplicity, and affordability, grappling with a system that prioritizes connectivity and functionality over accessibility.

Other Examples of Transformative Progress

The AT&T example is not unique. Across industries, services, and products once celebrated for their simplicity, functionality, and predictability have been transformed under the banner of progress. These changes, while bringing undeniable benefits, also impose significant financial and emotional costs on both providers and users.

Broadcast Television to Streaming Services

Provider Costs: Billions invested in developing proprietary platforms, licensing content, and building digital infrastructure.

User Costs: Free, over-the-air analog television has been replaced by subscription-based streaming services, with some households spending over \$100 monthly to access multiple platforms.

Impact: The simplicity of flipping through channels has been replaced by choice overload and decision fatigue.

Cash Payments to Digital Wallets

Provider Costs: Investment in secure platforms, compliance with regulations, and integration with retail systems.

User Costs: Users without banking access are excluded, while digital payments introduce fees and privacy risks.

Impact: The universal simplicity of cash has given way to a fragmented, technology-dependent ecosystem.

Mail to Email and Messaging Apps

Provider Costs: Postal systems have faced declining revenues, forcing investment in logistics and digital innovations.

User Costs: Email is free, but dependency on devices and internet access imposes indirect costs.

Impact: The loss of the tangible, personal touch of mail in favor of ephemeral, instant communication.

Traditional Farming to Industrialized Agriculture

Provider Costs: Adoption of genetically engineered crops and large-scale mechanization requires significant capital investment.

User Costs: Higher food prices, environmental degradation, and the loss of local agricultural practices.

Impact: Progress has introduced efficiency but at the expense of biodiversity and traditional methods.

Common Themes in the Ideology of Progress

Convenience Over Control: Progress often shifts control from users to providers, emphasizing convenience at the expense of autonomy.

Cost Redistribution: While providers incur significant initial expenses, users bear long-term recurring costs, creating a financial imbalance.

Exclusion Risks: Many innovations exclude those who lack digital literacy or access, widening social and economic divides.

Loss of Simplicity: Systems once intuitive and reliable have become complex and prone to failure.

Acknowledging the Costs of Progress

The ideology of progress assumes that change is inherently beneficial. While advancements bring remarkable improvements in functionality and scalability, they often overlook the tangible and intangible costs imposed on individuals. Acknowledging these costs, both for providers and users, is crucial in navigating future transitions. Transparency about the financial burden and a commitment to inclusive design can help mitigate the psychological scarring that often accompanies progress. Though we invest significantly in the physicality of ergonomic technology for humans, we could also by design, increase our investment in human empathy to recognize and address the reality that one size does not fit all when what has been will be no more.

More By This Author:

The Currency Of Our Emotions Is Altering The Valuation Of Our Equity
The Loss Of Jobs Vs. The Revenue Of Automation
When Autonomy Is Not Autonomous