Image source: DepositPhotos

A pending dock strike pits the efforts to automate skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled labor tasks in opposition to the workers seeking job security. Both sides have a valid purpose. Automating tasks affords savings, standardizes work processes, and may increase the speed with which tasks are accomplished. Laborers want to preserve their jobs and see automation as an end to their income and even their locations. Negotiations between the ports and the worker unions may agree but the issue that will perpetuate beyond this confrontation will be the unstoppable evolution and revolution of the workplace in its adoption of automation, robotics, algorithmic governance, and planning. This is not the same evolutionary circumstance of a dominant sector like retail overtaken by Amazon like online shopping it is a viral paradigm shift in social orientation. While there are only 45,000 dock workers, their work affects billions of dollars of commerce and hundreds of millions of people. Local, state, and federal governments own and administer the ports. Preservation of jobs and productivity are sociopolitical and economic issues. However, what of the ethics of trade-craft and its place in our future?

The dock strike exemplifies the larger tension between automation and labor, reflecting deep economic, ethical, and societal dilemmas. On one side, automation brings efficiency, reducing costs and boosting productivity in ways that benefit corporations, governments, and consumers. Yet, for workers, particularly those in highly specialized, on-the-job trained roles like longshoremen, the rise of automation threatens not only income but community and identity. This contrast between productivity and job preservation is the crux of a societal shift.

Economic Benefits of Automation: Automation enhances precision, reduces human error, and scales operations to meet modern demands. Ports, for example, are global hubs, and any inefficiency in cargo handling can cascade into wider disruptions across multiple industries. Automated systems, robotics, and algorithmic planning can streamline these operations, making them more predictable and faster, benefiting national economies and international trade. However, economic benefits often overlook the immediate impact on workers, especially those whose skills are rendered obsolete.

Impact on Workers and Communities: Dock workers, without a formal educational path like "longshoremanship," often acquire their expertise through years of laborious work, passed down through generations in some cases. For them, automation signifies more than job loss—it represents a severing of the connection to their skillset, which can't easily be transferred to automated systems. This loss also affects the broader community, as entire towns can be built around port industries. When automation scales up, the ripple effects—higher unemployment, shifting social dynamics, and declining economic bases—can lead to a destabilization of these local economies.

Unstoppable Workplace Evolution: As you point out, this is not a simple sectoral shift, like the retail transformation brought by Amazon. It is a paradigm shift that affects all layers of society, from the nature of work to the social compact between labor, business, and government. The evolution toward automation and algorithmic governance is inevitable, especially as it pervades industries like logistics, manufacturing, and even administrative roles. Dockworkers may be among the earliest casualties, but the implications spread much further.

Ethical and Sociopolitical Questions: The ethics of automation raise deeper questions. In a future where "craft" labor and manual trades are increasingly automated, is society doing enough to transition workers into the new economy? Or will the pursuit of productivity always outweigh the needs of individuals and communities? Government policy will play a crucial role, as the ports are public institutions with responsibilities not only to commerce but to the welfare of their workers and the communities that depend on them. Striking a balance between technological advancement and job preservation, or transitioning workers into new roles through retraining and education, will define the future workplace.

Trade-Craft in the Future: The ethics of craftsmanship in the age of automation bring forward the question: how do we value human labor in a future where machines can perform physical and mental tasks more efficiently? There's an inherent dignity and pride in skilled trades, including longshoremen’s work. As jobs like these disappear, it is essential to consider whether society will find ways to maintain human purpose and satisfaction, or whether we will allow the erosion of traditional crafts to alienate entire segments of the population.

Ultimately, the debate surrounding this strike goes beyond economic calculations—it taps into existential questions about the nature of work, the future of labor, and the ethical responsibility to those whose jobs are at risk in the wake of technological progress.

The ethical dilemma of port automation can indeed be examined through the lens of concrete economic realities—cost savings, efficiency, and security improvements. While automation may generate significant benefits for the mass economy, it comes at the expense of the livelihoods of a relatively small but vital group of workers. To fully understand the trade-off, it's crucial to break down the economic benefits and costs associated with port automation.

Economic Realities of Scaling Ports Through Automation

1. Cost Savings:
   • Labor Costs: Automation directly reduces labor costs, which are significant in port operations. A fully automated container terminal can lower labor expenses by up to 40-60%, depending on the level of automation. For ports handling millions of containers annually, this translates into millions in direct savings.
   • Operational Efficiency: Automated systems operate continuously (24/7/365) without the need for shifts, breaks, or holidays, maximizing throughput. For example, automated cranes and robots can load and unload ships faster than human-operated systems, improving turnaround times and reducing demurrage fees (costs paid by shipping companies for delayed cargo).
   • Predictability: Automation offers greater consistency and reduces the risks associated with human error. This increased reliability can drive down insurance costs, reduce damage to goods, and improve inventory management.
2. Increased Capacity:
   • Handling Growing Traffic: Global trade continues to grow, putting immense pressure on ports to expand their handling capacities. Automation allows ports to scale operations to meet rising volumes without requiring a proportional increase in labor. Automated systems like smart containers and AI-driven logistics optimize the flow of goods through ports, potentially increasing handling capacity by 25-35%.
   • Continuous Operation: Human labor typically limits port operations to shifts, but automation enables round-the-clock operations, which can increase annual throughput by 10-20%. This has a direct impact on reducing bottlenecks, leading to faster processing times and better port efficiency.
   • Cost of Delays: A delay in a port’s efficiency can result in tens of thousands of dollars per day per ship in demurrage charges, not to mention wider economic disruptions. Automated ports have the potential to significantly reduce delays, saving billions annually.
3. Security and Safety:
   • Improved Security: Automation strengthens security measures by reducing human interaction and incorporating AI for cargo scanning, tracking, and anomaly detection. With increasing concerns over smuggling, theft, and terrorism, automated systems can more effectively monitor cargo and port infrastructure. The enhanced surveillance systems reduce risks, which could save governments millions in security costs annually.
   • Worker Safety: Automated systems also reduce the incidence of on-site accidents. Ports are high-risk environments for injuries, and automation minimizes the need for workers to be in dangerous areas, potentially lowering insurance costs and legal liabilities related to workplace injuries.

Cost vs. Benefit: Is It a Fair Trade? 

While automation clearly brings economic advantages, the cost to displaced workers is significant, particularly because port jobs often provide good wages and benefits to a small but important workforce.

1. Economic Displacement:
   • There are approximately 45,000 dock workers in the U.S., and the average salary of a longshoreman is between $80,000 to $130,000 annually, with some positions reaching up to $200,000 including overtime. For many of these workers, automation could mean the end of secure, well-paying jobs, displacing individuals who may not easily transition into other roles without retraining.
   • The automation of a major port could eliminate thousands of jobs, creating localized economic instability. Communities reliant on port jobs could suffer, with a decline in local spending and an increase in social service demands such as unemployment benefits, healthcare, and job retraining programs.
2. Economic Benefits for the Masses:
   • Cost Reductions in Trade: The economic efficiencies gained through automation will likely trickle down to consumers. Lower transportation costs could result in lower prices for goods, benefiting millions of consumers worldwide. With automated ports reducing overheads, shipping companies could pass on cost savings to retailers, who then offer lower prices to end consumers.
   • Global Trade and Economic Growth: Ports serve as critical nodes in the global supply chain, handling billions of dollars in goods annually. Automation supports the growth of global trade, which is essential for economic development. By increasing capacity and improving speed, ports can handle greater volumes of goods at lower costs, stimulating growth across industries from manufacturing to retail.
3. A Moral Consideration:
   • The ethical dilemma centers on whether it's justifiable to displace a relatively small, specialized workforce for the broader economic gains of society. While automation enhances productivity and benefits consumers, the human cost cannot be ignored. For every dollar saved in port operations, there's a corresponding loss for workers who rely on these jobs. The societal question is whether it's fair to sacrifice the livelihoods of the few for the prosperity of the many.

Quantifying the Conflict

• Dollar Amount Savings Through Automation: A McKinsey report estimates that fully automated ports could lower terminal operating costs by 25-55%, representing millions to billions in savings depending on the size of the port. For instance, the Port of Rotterdam, one of the most automated in the world, handles approximately 460 million tons of cargo annually, and automation contributes to handling that volume with greater efficiency at reduced cost.
• Cost to Workers: With dockworker salaries averaging $80,000 - $130,000, and benefits often surpassing that, the immediate financial cost to these workers is significant. If automation reduces the workforce by 50%, this could result in a loss of tens of millions in wages annually for port communities. Factor in the additional societal costs (unemployment benefits, retraining), and the price becomes heavier.

Benefit for the Masses at the Cost of a Few

Automation at ports does offer substantial benefits for the mass—lower costs, faster shipping times, increased security, and economic growth. However, it comes at a steep cost for the relatively small group of workers who risk losing their jobs and incomes. The challenge lies in mitigating these negative effects through policies like retraining programs, economic safety nets, and possibly slower, more considerate automation rollouts. While automation serves the greater good in terms of economic growth and consumer benefit, the ethical dilemma of workforce displacement needs to be addressed thoughtfully to balance progress with human cost.

Several publicly traded companies develop automation software and robotic equipment used in automating cargo ports. These companies span across sectors, including industrial automation, robotics, and logistics technology.

Companies Authoring Automation Software for Cargo Ports

1. ABB Ltd. (NYSE: ABB)
   • Specialty: ABB is a leader in industrial automation and robotics. It provides software solutions for port automation, including systems for terminal operating software, crane automation, and container handling.
   • Relevant Products: ABB’s "Ability™" platform integrates smart sensors, analytics, and control systems to automate various port processes. It also automates quay cranes and yard cranes used in loading and unloading cargo.
2. Siemens AG (OTC: SIEGY)
   • Specialty: Siemens provides advanced automation software for port operations, including logistics management, energy management, and process automation.
   • Relevant Products: Siemens’ "Mindsphere" platform helps integrate and optimize logistics automation at ports through IoT connectivity, machine learning, and data analytics. Siemens also works on automating large-scale electrical systems and machinery at ports.
3. SAP SE (NYSE: SAP)
   • Specialty: SAP offers enterprise resource planning (ERP) and supply chain management software that is essential for port automation.
   • Relevant Products: SAP’s "Supply Chain Execution" software suite helps manage end-to-end logistics operations, including warehouse and transportation management systems (TMS) for ports. SAP’s technology supports the digital transformation of global supply chains, including in port automation.
4. Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL)
   • Specialty: Oracle offers cloud-based logistics and supply chain solutions that support port automation by streamlining cargo and inventory management.
   • Relevant Products: Oracle’s "Logistics Cloud" and "Transportation Management" software help automate and optimize shipping routes, container tracking, and cargo management, aiding in the overall automation of port operations.

Companies Building Robotic Equipment for Cargo Ports

1. Konecranes Oyj (OTC: KCRNF)
   • Specialty: Konecranes manufactures automated cranes and other heavy-lifting equipment for ports.
   • Relevant Products: Konecranes offers automated container handling cranes, including automated stacking cranes (ASC) and rubber-tired gantry cranes (RTG). They provide fully automated crane systems that are critical to the mechanization of port operations.
2. Cargotec Corporation (OTC: CYJBY)
   • Specialty: Cargotec’s Kalmar division specializes in cargo handling automation equipment and software.
   • Relevant Products: Kalmar’s automated straddle carriers, automated guided vehicles (AGVs), and terminal tractors are widely used in port automation. Cargotec’s technology also includes terminal operating systems (TOS) that integrate robotic equipment with software solutions.
3. Cimcorp (A Subsidiary of Murata Machinery, Ltd.)
   • Specialty: Cimcorp builds automated systems for material handling, including for use in cargo port automation.
   • Relevant Products: Cimcorp provides automated material handling systems that can be used for sorting and distributing cargo in warehouses and ports. Although a subsidiary of privately held Murata Machinery, Cimcorp plays a significant role in port automation with its robotic solutions.
4. Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ: HON)
   • Specialty: Honeywell provides both automation software and robotic systems used in logistics and supply chain management, including at ports.
   • Relevant Products: Honeywell's Intelligrated division offers automated material handling and robotics systems, including conveyor belts, sorting systems, and automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) for ports and warehouses.
5. Fanuc Corporation (OTC: FANUY)
   • Specialty: Fanuc is a leader in robotics, offering a wide range of industrial robots used for automated tasks in ports.
   • Relevant Products: Fanuc robots can be adapted for material handling tasks, such as loading and unloading containers and managing cargo in automated warehouses at ports. Fanuc’s robots are known for their high precision and ability to work in harsh industrial environments.
6. Toyota Industries Corporation (OTC: TYIDY)
   • Specialty: Toyota’s materials handling division is involved in providing automated systems and robotics for logistics and cargo handling.
   • Relevant Products: Toyota offers a range of automated guided vehicles (AGVs), forklifts, and automated solutions for handling cargo in logistics hubs, including ports.

Companies Benefiting from the Adoption of Automation in Ports

1. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)
   • Specialty: NVIDIA's AI platforms are crucial in powering the machine learning algorithms used in port automation software.
   • Relevant Products: NVIDIA provides the graphical processing units (GPUs) used for real-time data processing, vision systems, and AI-driven decision-making in port automation, from smart cameras to autonomous vehicles.
2. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE: ROK)
   • Specialty: Rockwell provides industrial automation and information technology solutions that are widely used across multiple industries, including ports.
   • Relevant Products: Rockwell’s "FactoryTalk" automation platform includes analytics, control systems, and integration tools that enhance the productivity and security of automated port operations.

Publicly traded companies like ABB, Siemens, Konecranes, Cargotec, and Honeywell stand to benefit significantly from the automation at ports, as their technologies address both the efficiency and scalability challenges posed by increasing global trade. Software developers like SAP and Oracle contribute to port automation by improving logistics management and handling billions of dollars in global commerce. These companies will continue to gain from the adoption of automation, even if the disruption comes at the high cost of displaced workers whose earned six-figure skills will be zeroed out.

More By This Author:

When Autonomy Is Not Autonomous
The Concept Of Money