Bring Back The Curtain

The Famous Saint Basil's Cathedral in Russia

Image Source: Pexels

I woke up this morning with particularly strong feelings about what to do in Ukraine. After all, triggering a broader war with Putin’s Russia over Ukraine itself seems foolhardy. The risks are simply far too massive. Putin himself threatened the use of Russia’s nuclear forces against any who resisted. On the other hand, failing to help gives carte blanche to other similar actions – in Taiwan, Georgia, the Baltics, Israel, UAE, Bahrain and so on.

So, what can be done? How can we avoid escalation while also responding aggressively?

After an admittedly short period of time – necessitated by the rapidly changing reality – I have the following recommendation. If Putin wants to restore the USSR, let’s restore the Iron Curtain. It can be done almost instantly, and walked back almost as quickly. There are three steps:

  1. No information (take down the Russian Internet)
  2. No travel (ban all visas for Russian nationals for all Western countries except under extraordinary circumstances - revoke visas of those currently in the West)
  3. No money (deny SWIFT access to all banks and institutions, provide Ukraine with the weapons to hit pipelines in Belarus and Ukraine (or even the Baltics), should they choose to do so)

There are risks associated with these activities. 

First and foremost, Europe could suffer short-term energy shortages. Nonetheless, Europe has the shale and nuclear resources to be very nearly energy independent. With U.S. help the shale resources could be very quickly developed. Somehow, the Europeans acted as if reliance on Russian energy was somehow cleaner than home production. It wasn’t and it isn’t. Yes, fracking comes with risks of local earthquakes. I suspect that those risks are not as great as the expansion of war to Poland and the Baltics.

Second, innocent Russians could be swept up in travel bans. This is most easily dealt with by allowing a short period of appeal.

Third, Putin could get angrier. This is true. However, responding to financial and cultural sanctions with weapons would be a poor idea. The U.S. might have little will, but the U.S. military – as it showed in a single conflict in Syria – is orders of magnitude more advanced than the Russian one. 

Escalation would not be in Putin’s interests unless he actually wants a nuclear conflict. 

Nobody believes he does.

The messaging of these activities would have to be completely clear: if Russia wants to return to the USSR, we’ll #bringbackthecurtain. I imagine the vast majority of Russians, especially the powerful oligarchs, won’t be supportive of this sort of shift.

The best part of these initiatives is that the modern nation of Russia can be restored in a few days... should the dream of domination fade.

It is in American, European, Israeli, Taiwanese, Arab, Indian, Southeast Asian and central Asian interests for this invasion to be responded to in a highly aggressive way. Any sort of military response carries too much risk. 

#bringbackthecurtain is a far safer, more limited – but nonetheless severe – response.

If Russia doesn't want to act like a member of the community of nations - then it doesn't have to be any more. And, yes, information and money could continue to be exchanged with China. But as much as Russia and China have aligned some of their strategic interests, I imagine few oligarchs dream of estates on the outskirts of Beijing.

#bringbackthecurtain No information, no travel, no money.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with
Danny Straus 2 years ago Member's comment

Doesn't Russia control the energy for nearly all of Europe?  If Europe turns up the pressure on Putin too much, can't he simply turn off the gas and let them freeze?

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

Spring is here. They can prioritize warmth and probably be fine while other sources are ramped up. Putin really needs that cash, so he won't shut it down. If he'd done this in November he'd have been in a much stronger position.

Susan Miller 2 years ago Member's comment

I was disappointed to see that Israel was not one of the nearly 100 countries that voted to condemn Russia for its attack on Ukraine. As a country that is often under attack, I expected more empathy from Israel.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

There is empathy. There is also a major Russian military force 100km from where I live. Israel strikes at Iranian targets under the Russian shield. Losing that ability could be catastrophic. That and Ben Gurion airport regularly has its guidance systems shut down by Russian air defense in Syria. We can help Ukraine, but we can't really afford to piss off Russia - we don't have a NATO shield. 

Harry Goldstein 2 years ago Member's comment

I heard Russia banned external debt payments. Wouldn't that hurt their economy more than help?

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

Much more, which is why they backtracked. Specifically, it might have gotten Putin killed. The Oligarchs don't want permanently dented credit  worthiness - and if Putin did this once he might do it again.

Vintage Vixen 2 years ago Member's comment

I stand with Ukraine! My prayers go out to the Ukrainian people.

Anne Barry 2 years ago Member's comment

Me too! In fact I think I speak for nearly the entire world when I saw we all do.  Who is actualy taking Russia's side?

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

I've seen people not taking the Ukrainian side. A few reasons given:
1) Ukraine is not really democratic and so Russia's invasion is enabling democracy. There's some truth here, but I think the invasion resistance has proven this to really be an internal Ukrainian problem - not one addressed by Russian conquest.
2) Ukrainians are racists/Nazis (not letting black people on a train, the AZOV Brigage). Again, there is some truth here - not that Russians are so anti-Racist. It is kind of irrelevant to the conflict.

3) That X, Y, Z (normally Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Libya etc...) deserved this attention and so Ukraine is unworthy. Basically trying to hijack the sympathy. These conflicts are very different, but those with only one tune tend to want to play only that tune.

Ukraine could have lost the world's sympathy. But the Pianist has done a masterful job of unifying his people and the world. The fact that the Putinists keep trying to insult him as an irrelevant comedian is really hurting them. I think a whole lot of Russians and Belarusians would prefer Zelensky to their own leadership.

Heck, I imagine this probably extends to a lot of other folk as well.

Ayelet Wolf 2 years ago Member's comment

Ukraine's president and prime minister are both Jewish.  Kind of hard for Putin to claim they are Nazis. 

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

People claim Israelis are Nazis. People are very flexible.

Texan Hunter 2 years ago Member's comment

I remember when Mitt Romney warned us about Russia when he was running for president... he was laughed at.

Bill Johnson 2 years ago Member's comment

The world should definitely remove Russia from SWIFT.

Terrence Howard 2 years ago Member's comment

Can you explain the significance of this? Will this block them from international financial transactions?  Wouldn't this hurt civilians in Russia, as well as foreign companies that do business in Russia?

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

Yes it would. But at some point you're responsible for the government you work with (as a foreign company) and the government you enable (as a citizen).

Jack S. Chen 2 years ago Member's comment

Western nations are all bark and no bite. It's enemies have come to realize this and are closing in.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

yup. The bite went out with Iraq and Afghanistan. Armies bit great, when they tried to be friendly and uplifting and that didn't work they seem to have just crumpled.

Bindi Dhaduk 2 years ago Member's comment

Why won't any country send troops and help protect the Ukrainian people?

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

They have no allies. The West won't even suspend gas purchases and SWIFT. This total lack of response can domino quickly. China has a great opportunity to attack Taiwan, Iran UAE etc... It is quite scary - I happen to live in one of the target zones.

Bindi Dhaduk 2 years ago Member's comment

But don't these countries realize they could be next? It's like Hitler and Czechoslovakia all over again.  Have we learned nothing from history?

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

I have friends in Czechia who are very afraid.

Lots of people know the history, but there is no will. What does the West stand for? What ideas are worth dying for? Russian troops probably think Russia is. Ukrainians certainly think Ukraine is. French? Germans? Americans? There are some holding on to old ideas, but the thought leaders have all moved on. National interest is so out of date.

They will stay 'moved on' until those who have the will decide to impose it.

All that said, this isn't 1938. Putin isn't trying to destroy the world in the name of an ideological mission (either Communism or Racism).

He and his friends just want to control it and make money in the process.

Bindi Dhaduk 2 years ago Member's comment

We spent 20 years in Afghanistan. You'd think we could spare some troops for a few weeks in Ukraine, especially now that all our troops have been called home.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

We really don't want to escalate with Russia. A proxy war is far more effective for Western purposes as it has far less risk of escalating into WWIII. Think of Afghanistan when it was a proxy slowing Soviet ambitions. Or Vietnam limiting American ambitions. A superpower can be very effectively stunted without a head-to-head conflict.

Just the same, we don't want Ukraine attacking targets in Russia. They need to stay in Ukraine and they know it.

Texan Hunter 2 years ago Member's comment

The question most on my mind is.... would this not have happened if #Trump were still president?  The world seems to have completely gone downhill once Biden took over.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

The US is weak. Everybody knows it. Biden is just weak and predictable as opposed to weak and unpredictable. You never would have done this with Trump - but not because he was some moral giant. You wouldn't have done it because you wouldn't have KNOWN how Trump would respond. The unknowns allowed him to play stronger than he was.

Texan Hunter 2 years ago Member's comment

Yes, just like we don't know how Putin will respond.  He's already crossed so many lines that we thought he never would.  What's to stop him from using the nuclear option?  Maybe he would, maybe he wouldn't.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

exactly.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

exactly.

Dick Kaplan 2 years ago Member's comment

I disagree.  Not about Biden but about Trump.  Trump has made no secret of his admiration for Putin, nor hs disdain for Ukraine.  Even just this week Trump praised Putin's actions, called him a "genius" and "very savvy" and repeated the Russian propoganda that the Ukrainians would prefer to live under Russian rule.

Why do you think Trump's reaction would be any different if he were still president?

Angry Old Lady 2 years ago Member's comment

It wouldn't be. #Trump spent the 4 years of his presidency sucking up to Putin, and trying to humiliate and weaken NATO.  Sometimes I wonder if Trump is on Moscow's payroll or if they "got something" on the guy.  Supporting Putin's tyranny is about as UNAMERICAN as one can get!
gif

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

NATO was already weak. People other than the U.S. needed to pay their fair share and never had. Trump's shakeup was realistic, imo.

That said, I am incredibly unimpressed with the man in general. His quote, though stupid, didn't quite praise what is happening.

He also said Putin played his cards very well. True. He also said Biden's non-response was very sad. Also true.

He said it in an idiotic way, but those who have quoted it have been guilty of some cherry picking.

Angry Old Lady 2 years ago Member's comment

There's something wrong when a man praises a tryannt, which Trump does often. Where was his praise for the brave people of Ukraine who are now dying in defense of their country.  It's fine to state Putin is a genius, as long as it's clear you mean evil genius and don't support what he's doing.  To me, it sounded liked Trump did the opposite. Even said we should have done the same as Puting to our Southern neighbors.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

I don't. I have no idea what his reaction would be if the situation were different. He is unpredictable. It might well be just what he's said in this circumstance. Maybe he bears a grudge over the failure to force them to investigate Biden corruption.

I do not think of him as any sort of leader. I am not a Trump apologist.

But he is unpredictable.

Dick Kaplan 2 years ago Member's comment

There are no good options on how to respond, without triggering World War III. Putin knew Ukraine's allies were too scared to take any concrete actions to hurt him. And with his new pact with China, he need not fear Western sanctions.

However, I suspect that had every Western ally of Ukraine stationed some of their troops in Ukraine, Putin would never have dared to launch an attack. That would have effectively declared war on every Western nation simultaneously. 

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

Maybe, we'll see if Putin decides to extend his reach in other directions. Ukraine has no allies, though.

Dick Kaplan 2 years ago Member's comment

NATO announced that they were planning to offer them membership. It doesn't exactly make them look good to offer no real support now that this is the result.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

The question is now whether NATO will actually stand up for one of its members. If I were Putin I might try chasing 'terrorists' into Poland and seeing what happens.

Anne Davis 2 years ago Member's comment

Technically, Ukraine is not a NATO member.

Joseph Cox 2 years ago Contributor's comment

It is definitely not. But Poland is. And if the Russians get too pissed about Poland serving as an insurgent base they might try NATO's resolve by attacking into Poland.

They'd get their rear ends handed to them on a platter, but they might try.