Why We Deny.

Denial is a gut-level dodge—us ducking truths too big, too inconvenient, or too damning to face. It’s not just blind spots; it’s choosing blindness because the alternative demands something we won’t give up: pride, power, or peace of mind. And when we deny, problems don’t vanish—they rot, spreading corruption because we’ve refused to cut them out at the root.

Start with George Wallace in the 1960s—his “segregation forever” stand at Alabama’s capitol in 1963. The facts were glaring: civil rights protests, federal rulings, moral pressure piling up. Yet he denied the tide, clinging to a dying racial hierarchy. Why? Power and identity—he’d built his base on white supremacy, and admitting change meant losing it all. The corruption wasn’t just delayed justice; it was the violence and division that festered while he postured.

Fast-forward to Richard Nixon and Watergate, 1972. Break-ins, wiretapping, dirty tricks—evidence mounted that his campaign was crooked. Nixon denied it, stonewalling investigations, claiming “I am not a crook.” Why? Self-interest and ego—admitting guilt meant torching his presidency and legacy. The corruption? A constitutional crisis, eroded trust in government, and a resignation that left the nation reeling. Denial didn’t save him; it just dragged the mess deeper.

Now, Anthony Fauci and COVID-19, circa 2020-2025. By early 2020, data trickled in—masks weren’t the cure-all, lockdowns wrecked economies, and vaccine skepticism wasn’t baseless. Fast-forward to 2024: House hearings revealed Fauci sidestepped questions on gain-of-function research funding in Wuhan, sticking to semantic dodges despite NIH grant trails. Why deny? Admitting missteps or uncertainty risked his authority, the public’s trust in science, and his own lionized image. The corruption? A polarized health response—millions distrust vaccines, policies ossified into dogma, and a reckoning stalled. As of January 20, 2025, Biden’s preemptive pardon of Fauci for any federal offenses from 2014 onward only fuels the fire—denial shielded by power, leaving truth murky.

Kamala Harris, 2024 election cycle. She ran on economic fixes—price gouging bans, rent caps—echoing Nixon’s failed 1970s price controls. Inflation stats were clear: 20% food price hikes since 2021, supply chain scars from COVID, not just corporate greed. Yet she denied complexity, pushing simplistic “big business bad” rhetoric. Why? Political gain—admitting systemic issues over quick populist wins wouldn’t rally voters. The corruption? If she’d won, we’d likely see ineffective policies, shortages, black markets—like Nixon’s era—because denial of root causes cripples real solutions. Post-election, her swearing-in of senators on January 3, 2025, who’d mocked her name and platform, underscores the dissonance she ignored.

Why do we deny? Fear’s still there—Wallace feared irrelevance, Nixon disgrace, Fauci a tarnished legacy, Harris a lost election. Self-interest drives it too—power, profit, or votes. Social pressure and ideology lock it in: Fauci’s science tribe, Harris’s progressive base. The pattern’s old as dirt, but these current cuts bleed fresher. Denial doesn’t dodge the truth; it just kicks the can, letting corruption bloom—whether it’s segregated schools, a broken White House, a botched pandemic, or a stalled economy. Facing it takes guts, and we’re still short on that.

---

More By This Author:

Facts Can Still Be Propaganda, When Manipulated
The Ideology Of Progress
The Currency Of Our Emotions Is Altering The Valuation Of Our Equity