Extraordinary pre-weekend action in a number of stocks; overall market and in-line with my pre-opening comment on 'X', the S&P's decline following the President's speech was an overreaction; even as Oil exploded higher too. It's been a short volatile trading week and we got our down-up flip; at least for the tickers we primarily watch. Not everything is working great, but most of it is doing fine. Here's another bit of a 'possible' heads-up: a) there are reports the President will reveal a new Defense Bill (allocation) tomorrow; but I don't know; and b) there is suggested to be a proposal in New York City to contract with a counter-drone system (we do know that NYC apparently tested or demonstrated Raider / Optimus to the NYPD and/or the NYFD last year); but we do not know of other contenders. If Ondas gets that order it won't be huge in dollars, but could set a precedent for other municipalities. I'm totally speculating as to 'what' (beyond the technicals and/or deals) may be on-tap; but regardless we anticipated the shares to bounce back from all dips. |
There's no way in hell that the Saudi or Dubai crowds will pick Iran over their U.S. relationships, which include various business, not solely movement of Oil & Gas. It's often nerve-wracking and conviction required as you never know the future for sure; but like support for our troops in a fight (regardless of how you view the path to conflict which historians can dissect), you need conviction and will see how it works out. In the case of our drone tickers ... very well so far. |
|
Market X-ray: incredible Thursday ... stock market never deserved the heavy reaction to Trump's speech. Probably 'the' market wanted to 'cut and run' and a unilateral ceasefire; which would (in the minds of most strategists) be policy error that would shorten the conflict, but put everyone in the region 'at risk' So you got a 'finish the mission' approach; which is trickier, but may be essential. Of course he was tired; scripted mostly and seemed a bit conflicted; but this is 'not' news; and actually the lack of a cohesive strategy (or so-called 'exit plan') might serve to his benefit; even be part of the plan if you ponder it. If he's not clear about it; that keeps Tehran off balance and unsure what may come next. And that's how it should be. And by the way; people are feeling bad about the economy day-to-day; and of course a lot of that is Oil-price related. We can't redact the war; we so far are not deescalating as the rants about Trump's speech attest too ... and I suspect this gets dialed-back (somehow) in the weeks ahead. POTUS 'is' conscious of the time-limits before things thrust deeper, so you just have to weight / debate who 'gives' first; the U.S. or (what remains of the mullahs) Iran. The U.S. is at the helm of Oil production (especially when including Venezuela..ahem)... so I would contend we have more staying power in this than generally recognized; in fact perhaps some states ought to suspend gasoline taxes until the conflict ends (hello California).. and give the President a bit of time to wrap this up so that a real popular revolution gets going in Iran; or make a deal. Status quo is not likely to persist for very long.
|







Comments
Log in or sign up to join the conversation.