Image source: Pixabay

It has been a long, cold, and snowy weekend here in New York. Not a lot of snow, but just enough to make you not want to leave the couch. The good news is that if you’re looking for a few more days away from the market, you’re in luck, as U.S. markets will be closed on Monday.

For those of you who are die-hard market fanatics, however, there’s always Weekend Wall Street and Weekend Tech—and neither seem to be in a particularly good mood, given the latest demands surrounding Greenland. Weekend US Tech CFDs are down about 75 bps as of Sunday at 8:30 AM ET.

It doesn’t mean much other than futures will likely fall by that amount at the start of the trading session when they resume on Sunday night at 6:00 PM ET. The other consideration is that Tuesday is another potential opinion day from the Supreme Court, and given how volatility was priced on Friday, it would not be surprising to see overnight volatility dynamics come into play, pushing implied volatility higher into the 10:00 AM release window.
 

(Click on image to enlarge)

Tuesday will also be a $14 billion T-Bill Settlement date, which should add some tighter liquidity conditions into the mix as well. As a result, Tuesday could prove to be an interesting day right from the start. If overnight funding rates start to rise this week, that would increase pressure on usage of the Fed’s Standing Repo Facility, with the key level on the overnight rate being above 3.75%.

To me, the setup in the S&P 500 looks very weak. At this point, it appears the index will be in negative gamma when trading resumes on Tuesday, which could further contribute to volatility expansion. The rising wedge pattern remains firmly in place, and a break below support at 6,900 would increase the odds of a deeper pullback.
 

(Click on image to enlarge)

10-year Treasury yields broke out on Friday, and I happen to think much of that move had to do with the quarterly refunding questionnaire that was sent to primary dealers on Friday afternoon. The most pronounced steepening in the curve occurred in the “belly,” which makes sense if the Treasury is considering changing the 7-year note from a monthly new issue to a quarterly new issue with two reopenings.

To me, it sounds as though the Treasury may be preparing the market for a potential change in issuance sizes or duration at some point in the not-too-distant future, though that is admittedly speculative. Still, when you look at the rate moves, yields rose the most in the 5-year to 7-year sector, which fits with this line of thinking.

If the move had instead been driven primarily by the idea that Kevin Hassett was no longer a candidate for Fed chair, I would have expected yields to rise more sharply at the front end of the curve.
 

(Click on image to enlarge)

Whatever the reason, it doesn’t change the fact that the 10-year yield broke out in a meaningful way, and that a move higher may now be underway. Follow-through on Tuesday will be important, of course, but something has clearly changed.
 

(Click on image to enlarge) 

More By This Author: