Pass The Cigars: US Lifts Some Restrictions On Cuba; Why Now?
Sanctions and embargoes don't work. And in the case of Cuba, it took the US 52 years to partially realize that.
In 1962, President John F. Kennedy signed into law a Cuban trade embargo. I have long known how foolish Kennedy's decision was (and the decision of every president since). But I did not know until today how blatantly hypocritical Kennedy's action was.
A clip from Cigars All Around in the Financial Times explains:
The day before Kennedy signed the law, "Kennedy ordered an aide to buy him 1,000 Petit Upmanns cigars. It was only after Kennedy got word that his request had been carried out that he authorised the new regulations that banned Cuban imports and would have made the purchase illegal."
Wow.
For 52 years, the US embargo poisoned he Cuba-US relationship. What good did it do? Did it drive Castro out of power? Or did it help keep Castro in power?
I suggest the latter.
Free trade is always beneficial and always better than war or cold war. US goods flowing into Cuba and tourists with money would have done more for a regime change than pressure.
Hopefully it won't take 52 years for the US to realize the stupidity of sanctions on Russia. Don't hold your breath.
Cuba's Support of Terrorism
The Financial Times notes "Obama ordered a six month review of Cuba’s designation as a 'state sponsor of terrorism'. Even the State Department no longer attempts to justify this label, which devalues Washington’s word on international terrorism issues and triggers international financial sanctions against Cuba."
In other words, we've been lied to for years about Cuba. Hardly shocking.
Why Now?
I would like to suggest Obama is taking this step because it's the right thing to do, but that's not what is likely happening.
I believe this sentence explains what's going on. "In 2000, Cuban-American voters broke three-to-one for Republicans in the presidential election. But in 2012, exit polls showed Cuban-Americans splitting 50:50."
When push comes to shove, expect a choice to be made on how many votes that decision may win. Right vs. wrong is simply not part of the decision-making process!
Regardless, doing the right thing for the wrong reason is better than doing the wrong thing for the right reason.
So pass the cigars. Just don't smoke the damn things unless you want cancer of the tongue and mouth.
Disclosure: This content is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. It shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial ...
more
I think you cut through the fluff and dove right into the heart of the matter. I'm not a fan of Obama, but I do believe he has a point that 50 years hasn't changed much and more can be achieved through engagement. In that regard he is correct. But I too believe the decision was made for political gains.
It reminds me of how Obama was against gay marriage as long as the majority of Americans were as well. But the second the polls tipped in favor of gay marriage, he changed his position to match the majority. But perhaps I'm not being fair - I think most (but not all) politicians would behave in the same way.