Oil Crash Blamed On CTA, Risk Parity Liquidation

Yesterday's furious selloff in crude prompted even more confusion amid the trading community, recently whipsawed by seemingly chaotic moves across all asset classes, and desperate for the reason behind the sharp dump.

Some, such as DB's Jim Reid attributed the violent selling to the publication of Saudi Arabia's budget plan, which as we discussed overnight includes ambitious oil revenue targets of $177 billion for next year. To reach that number, the Kingdom is either assuming very unrealistic oil prices of around $80 per barrel, or it plans to pump more than the 10.2 million barrels per day target agreed earlier this month. Since the $80 per barrel figure is around 30% more than consensus estimates, the latter scenario looks more probable, which would equate to a significant increase in global supply and would end up being more bearish for prices.

Others speculated that in the same vein as commodity trader Pierre Andurand, who closed out most of his positions after suffering a historic loss in 2018, the selling was merely hedge funds liquidating deep underwater positions ahead of the new year.

Now, according to a third theory - and one which Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin would approve of - Nomura is blaming the sharp sell-off in WTI on algo-investors such as CTAs and RiskParity funds, which in recent times have become the go-to scapegoat to explain any otherwise inexplicable market moves.

According to Nomura's Masanari Takada, CTAs quickly swept away the small amount of long WTI positions they held and flipped to the short side by selling WTI crude futures. Furthermore, Takada notes that the "actual" speculative position data released by the CFTC as of last week shows that not only systematic trend-followers like CTAs but other short-term investors also cut their existing long positions aggressively.

(Click on image to enlarge)

As Nomura further adds, selling of commodities by RiskParity investors for the purpose of deleveraging is one such example of existing long positions. Apart from a regular rebalancing which tends to occur during the final week of the month, RiskParity can also adjust their portfolio leverage ratio at any time given changes in overall market volatility. As a result, the Takada currently identifies some selling pressure on the broad commodity market, mainly in crude oil futures, from quick sales by RiskParity funds that are “long-only”, to reduce their leverage ratios.

(Click on image to enlarge)

The silver lining, for oil bulls, is that if indeed this was a forced liquidation by the quants, with much of the selling overhang gone, any reversal in price momentum will quickly see the CTAs reverse their bias and start buying to the upside, forcing a short squeeze in the process, and restarting the entire price cycle from square one.

Disclosure: Copyright ©2009-2018 ZeroHedge.com/ABC Media, LTD; All Rights Reserved. Zero Hedge is intended for Mature Audiences. Familiarize yourself with our legal and use policies every time ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
William K. 5 years ago Member's comment

We need more deflationary pressures applied, and so this is sort of good news. But if the market ever started making the buy/sell decisions based on facts instead of fears, it might be in better shape. How do the poor fools chained to every possible fear ever hope to succeed???

Adam Reynolds 5 years ago Member's comment

Yes, more deflationary pressure would be good.