Household Net Worth: The "Real" Story

Note from dshort: With last week's release of the Federal Reserve's Z.1. Financial Accounts of the United States for Q4 2013, I have updated this commentary to incorporate the latest data.

Let's take a long-term view of household net worth from the latest Z.1 release. A quick glance at the complete data series shows a distinct bubble in net worth that peaked in Q4 2007 with a trough in Q1 2009, the same quarter the stock market bottomed. The latest Fed balance sheet shows a total net worth that is 45.2% above the 2009 trough at a new all-time high 17.8% above the 2007 peak. The nominal Q4 net worth is up 3.8% from the previous quarter and up 13.8% year over year.

Click to View
Click for a larger image

But there are problems with this analysis. Over the six decades of this data series, total net worth has grown about 7699%. A linear vertical scale on the chart above is misleading because it fails to provide an accurate visual illustration of growth over time. It also gives an exaggerated dimension to the bubble that began in 2002.

But there is another more serious problem, one that has to do with the data itself rather than the method of display. Over the same time frame that net worth grew seven-thousand-plus percent, the value of the 1950 dollar shrank to about nine cents. The Federal Reserve gives us the nominal value of total net worth, which is significantly skewed by money illusion. Here is a log scale chart adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index.

Click to View
Click for a larger image

Here is the same chart with an exponential regression through the data. The regression helps us see the twin wealth bubbles peaking in Q1 2000 and Q1 2007, the Tech and Real Estate bubbles. The trough in real household net worth was in Q1 2009. From that quarter to the latest data point, net worth initially trended at about the same growth rate as the overall regression but has improved over the last five quarters. We are currently 0.6% above the regression.

Click to View
Click for a larger image

Net Worth Per Capita

The next chart gives us a more intuitive sense of real net worth. Here I've divided the inflation-adjusted series above by the Bureau of Commerce's mid-month population estimates, which have been recorded since January 1959.

Click to View
Click for a larger image

I say "more intuitive" because the per-capita adjustment brings the latest data point from the Multi-Trillion stratosphere to $25,418 -- an amount we can relate to on a personal level. At the end of 2013, we're $587 below the real peak in Q1 2007.

Note: I've referred to this data series as "household" net worth. But, as I show in the chart titles, it also includes the net worth of nonprofit organizations. The ratio of two isn't clearly defined in the Fed data, and it obviously varies by asset and liability component. I've seen estimates that the nonprofit component is around six percent of the total net worth.

One easy (and rather illuminating) point of comparison in the Z.1 data is the relative share of real estate at market value (B.100 lines 3, 4, and 5). In the latest report, nonprofit organizations account for 6.3% of combined household and nonprofit real estate (unchanged from last quarter). That percentage in the quarterly data has ranged from a high of 9.2% in Q4 1974 to a low of 4.5% in Q3 1996.

© Copyright 2013, Advisor Perspectives, Inc. All rights reserved.

How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments

Leave a comment to automatically be entered into our contest to win a free Echo Show.
Or Sign in with
Dr. Paul Price 11 years ago Contributor's comment
Doug, It appears you're simply pointing out that household net worth advanced more than it deserved to in the first half of 2007 and that we've now come back to 'right on trend'. What's bad about that? No one should expect to keep gains that were undeserved to begin with. Stocks might not be worth as much as their nominal value versus seven years earlier. The buying power of cash is not was it was back in 2007 either. Where's the beef?