Heavy Selling In Nasdaq And S&P As Semiconductors Crushed

A difficult day for the Semiconductor Index as it sheds nearly 6%, losing not just 50-day MA support, but also breakout support of 5,200. Technicals are net bearish, but not oversold on intermediate-term stochastics.


Not surprisingly, the Nasdaq and S&P took a big hit. Monday's weak bounce tapered quickly with the S&P contained by former support, turned resistance. The index finished the day on its 50-day MA, but if there is to be a bullish stand then I would like to see a spike low with an end-of-day finish back at the 50-day MA. For tomorrow, if there is an intraday move to test the May swing high of 5,342, then it might be a good aggressive buy.


The Nasdaq cleanly sliced through its 50-day MA, weakening the thesis for a successful 50-day MA support test in the S&P, but let's see there. There were a new 'sell' trigger in On-Balance-Volume to go with earlier 'sell' trigger in ADX and MACD. Intermediate stochastics are not on a 'sell', and if we see a price recovery on a test of the 50-midline of said stochastics, then the bullish thesis remains intact, despite how ugly the chart looks now.


The Russell 2000 (IWM) is caught between its own surge and broader weakness in the Nasdaq and S&P. The 20-day MA is fast advancing and is near $210 support. I would be happier to see a test of the 20-day MA, and today's action suggests it will get there. Technicals are net bullish.

Today's selling suggests there is another day's worth in the tank, but watch premarket for leads. If the market opens higher, then look for a bullish harami, or better still, a bullish harami cross. This is one of the most consistent reversal patterns and should be watched closely in the Semiconductor, Nasdaq, and S&P indices.


More By This Author:

"Dead Cat" Bounce As Weak Buying Visits Indices
Sellers Strike As S&P And Nasdaq Gap Down
Russell 2000 Kicks On Again With A Bright Start To Week

Disclaimer: Investors should not act on any information in this article without obtaining specific advice from their financial advisors and should not rely on information herein as the primary ...

more
How did you like this article? Let us know so we can better customize your reading experience.

Comments