Image Source: Unsplash

Introduction

This year has been challenging for the crypto industry, especially in the U.S. Despite regulatory hurdles, some states have emerged as favorable hotspots for crypto businesses. 

A recent article by Coincub.com, "Crypto Business Index 2023: Best US states for crypto companies," was published yesterday. It takes a state-by-state approach to understand where crypto businesses find refuge in the United States, especially in a year marked by regulatory upheavals. 

The Coincub.com index offers invaluable insights into these trends, providing companies with a roadmap for navigating the U.S. crypto landscape.

Key Findings:

• Colorado Dominates: Holds 33% of U.S. crypto MSBs, thanks to its friendly regulations.
• Regulatory Inconsistencies: Wyoming and Colorado lead in MSB licenses; Mississippi and Louisiana trail.
• Unexpected Leaders: Aurora and Colorado Springs surpass New York and Miami in crypto MSBs.
• New York Lags: Ranks 51st in crypto MSBs, below Hawaii and above Puerto Rico.

Methodology and Data Sources

Coincub.com primarily relied on the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to compile its list of Money Service Businesses (MSBs) in the crypto space. The list was then cross-validated with Bloomberg's legal data.

Coincub.com used AI categorization to distinguish crypto-related companies from the FinCEN list. This method enabled them to compile a list of 1,080 companies with medium to high confidence levels.

The 'Colorado Phenomenon'

Surprisingly was the emergence of Colorado as a significant epicenter for crypto activity. It accounts for 33% of all U.S. crypto businesses registered with FinCEN. Governor Jared Polis is credited for this, implementing policies that have positioned Colorado as a magnetic pull for MSBs. Also intriguing is the "Crypto Super Bowl" hosted in Denver, attracting over 30,000 participants from 110 countries.

Regulatory Leaders and Laggards

Wyoming and Colorado lead the pack, with crypto MSBs constituting around 20% of all MSB-licensed companies in these states. States like Mississippi, South Carolina, and Louisiana need to catch up, with less than 1% of their MSB licenses allocated to crypto companies. It suggests a less favorable or perhaps more conservative regulatory landscape in these states.

Geographical Shifts: Cities in Focus

Another eyebrow-raiser was that cities in Colorado like Aurora and Colorado Springs outperformed traditional hubs like New York and Miami in hosting crypto MSBs. It's a fascinating shift, driven by favourable regulations, talent pool and accumulated blockchain expertise.

Industry Categories: A Diverse Landscape

Colorado leads in emerging categories like 'Metaverse & NFT' and 'DeFi', while states like Delaware, New York, and New Jersey focus significantly on Exchanges. New York stands out for its focus on 'Asset Management & Investment,' which aligns with its traditional role as a financial powerhouse.

The Dark Side of Crypto: Scams, Regulatory Skepticism, and the Road Ahead

In a recent Senate Committee hearing, Gary Gensler, the Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), painted a rather bleak picture of the crypto industry, describing it as a "highly speculative asset class" rife with "fraud and scams and hucksters." This characterization gains some weight when we examine the recent data from Coincub.com, revealing that 5% of crypto Money Service Businesses (MSBs) registered with FinCEN have been marked as scams. Interestingly, Colorado, a state heralded for its crypto-friendly environment, houses a staggering 70.91% of these scam-related MSBs.

Concluding Remark: The Ripple Effect of Regulatory Choices on Local Economies

While Gary Gensler's portrayal of the crypto industry as a breeding ground for "fraud and scams" warrants attention, viewing this characterization within the larger financial ecosystem is vital. The recommended shifts in regulatory practices—such as specialized categorization for crypto companies, tracking unique identifiers, and a more stringent approval process—are not just remedial measures for the crypto sector. 

They could be necessary evolutions in oversight that apply to financial markets at large. Instead of blaming the crypto industry for its pitfalls, regulators should consider whether the existing frameworks are sufficiently agile to accommodate this rapidly evolving sector.

As demonstrated by the rise of cities like Aurora and Colorado Springs in the crypto landscape, a favorable regulatory environment can catalyze significant economic benefits, including job creation and financial innovation. 

On the flip side, traditionally strong financial hubs like New York need to catch up, potentially hindering their residents' access to cutting-edge crypto services. This underscores the need for regulatory frameworks to evolve to mitigate risks and unlock the economic potential that a burgeoning industry like crypto can offer.

More By This Author:

The Financial Fitness Challenge: 30 Days To A Healthier Bank Account
5 Fascinating Facts You Probably Did Not Know About The Indian Rupee
Is Crypto Just A Bubble? Here's Why Not