Union Pacific Corporation Dividend Stock Analysis
Image Source: Unsplash
Linked here is a detailed quantitative analysis of Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis:
Company Description: Union Pacific Corporation operates the largest U.S. railroad, with more than 32,000 miles of rail serving the western two-thirds of the country.
Fair Value: In calculating fair value, I consider the NPV MMA Differential Fair Value along with these four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Avg. High Yield Price
2. 20-Year DCF Price
3. Avg. P/E Price
4. Graham Number
UNP is trading at a premium to all four valuations above. When also considering the NPV MMA Differential, the stock is trading at a 375.2% premium to its calculated fair value of $54.07. UNP did not earn any Stars in this section.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section, there are three possible Stars and three key metrics, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. Free Cash Flow Payout
2. Debt To Total Capital
3. Key Metrics
4. Dividend Growth Rate
5. Years of Div. Growth
6. Rolling 4-yr Div. > 15%
UNP earned one Star in this section for 2.) above. The stock earned a Star as a result of its most recent Debt to Total Capital being less than 45% The company has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1900 and has increased its dividend payments for 0 consecutive years.
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account (MMA) or Treasury bond? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
1. NPV MMA Diff.
2. Years to > MMA
The negative NPV MMA Diff. means that on a NPV basis, the dividend earnings from an investment in UNP would be less than a similar amount invested in MMA earning a 20-year average rate of 3.75%. If UNP grows its dividend at 0.0% per year, it will never equal an MMA yielding an estimated 20-year average rate of 3.75%.
Peers: The company's peer group includes: CSX Corporation (CSX) with a 1.3% yield, Kansas City Southern, and Norfolk Southern Corp (NSC) with a 2.1% yield.
Conclusion: UNP did not earn any Stars in the Fair Value section, earned one Star in the Dividend Analytical Data section, and did not earn any Stars in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a total of one Star. This quantitatively ranks UNP as a 1-Star Very Weak stock.
Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the share price would need to decrease to $47.88 before UNP's NPV MMA Differential increased to the $3,500 minimum that I look for in a stock with 0 years of consecutive dividend increases. At that price, the stock would yield 10.9%.
Resetting the D4L-PreScreen.xls model and solving for the dividend growth rate needed to generate the target $3,500 NPV MMA Differential, the calculated rate is 16.2%. This dividend growth rate is higher than the 0.0% used in this analysis, thus providing no margin of safety. UNP has a risk rating of 2.25 which classifies it as a Medium risk stock.
UNP's business mix includes agricultural products, automotive, chemicals, coal, industrial products and intermodal. Its free cash flow payout is 66% (up from 56%) is above my maximum allowed, while its debt to total capital at 1% (flat) is well below my desired maximum. UNP is trading above my calculated fair value price of $54.07, and its dividend yield is below my current minimum, and it failed to raise its dividend at the appointed time. As such, I will wait for a more opportune time before investing in this company.
More By This Author:
Kellanova Company Dividend Stock Analysis
Walmart Stores, Inc. Dividend Stock Analysis
Texas Instruments Inc. Dividend Stock Analysis
Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I held no position in UNP (0.0% of my Dividend Growth Portfolio).
Disclaimer: The material presented here is for informational purposes ...
more
Revenues at RVSN huge increase, will soon have 1000% metric.
Software Price to Sales (P/S) ratio averages around 4 in this sector. Here are some projections (sales in millions):
$25 -> * 4 = $100M cap = $14.85 / share
$50 -> * 4 = $250M cap = $37.13 / share
$100 -> * 4 = $400M cap = $74.25 / share
Rail Vision’s press release on 2/20 said that they sold 10 Main Line systems for $1.4 million to Israel Railways. That translates to $140K per Main Line system. Applying that math to the numbers above:
$25M contract = 178 systems
$50M contract = 356 systems
$100M contract = 712 systems
Given the number of trains in the world, these potential sales numbers (in the immediate future ) sound very feasible to me.